Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction

PurposeThe aim of this study was to predict the hamstring graft sizes prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in adults by using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsFifty-one patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture were prospectively evaluated. Diameter and cross-sectional areas of the gracilis and the semitendinosus tendons at two different levels were measured separately by preoperative MRI. In surgery, harvested gracilis and semitendinosus tendons were measured individually (2-stranded) and together (4-stranded) by using a graft sizing block. Radiological and operative sizes of the grafts were compared by Pearson’s correlation test. ROC analysis was done to determine a possible cutoff value for the preoperative measurements.ResultsThere were statistically significant correlations between the MR cross-sectional areas of gracilis, semitendinosus, gracilis + semitendinosus and intraoperative graft sizes of 2-stranded gracilis, 2-stranded semitendinosus and 4-stranded gracilis + semitendinosus tendons [P < 0.05]. No significant correlation was observed between the MR diameters of the gracilis, semitendinosus, gracilis + semitendinosus tendons and intraoperative graft sizes of 2-stranded gracilis, 2-stranded semitendinosus and 4-stranded gracilis + semitendinosus tendons [n.s].ConclusionCross-sectional areas of the hamstring tendons in MR images can be used to estimate the sizes of hamstring grafts prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery which may be very helpful to predict possible graft insufficiencies and take precautions if needed.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

[1]  T. Fowler,et al.  Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  V. Senekovič,et al.  Simple and safe arthroscopic placement and removal of cannulated screw and washer for fixation of tibial avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1996, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And Related.

[3]  Yan Wang,et al.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with at least 2.5 years' follow-up comparing hamstring tendon autograft and irradiated allograft. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[4]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? , 2010, The Knee.

[5]  N. Adachi,et al.  Predictive value of preoperative 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  Luiz Eduardo Moreira Teixeira,et al.  Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we today? , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  Xavier Tomas,et al.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Hamstring Graft Size Prediction , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  K. Shino,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Multistranded Autogenous Semitendinosus Tendon , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  I. Harris,et al.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  J. Hart,et al.  Predictors for Hamstring Graft Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  K. Shino,et al.  Cross-sectional area measurement of the semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1998, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  K. Spindler,et al.  Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  F. Noyes,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  R. Warren,et al.  Anatomic considerations in harvesting the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and a technique of harvest , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  Musa Citak,et al.  Effect of tunnel position and graft size in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evaluation of time-zero knee stability. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  A. Ferretti,et al.  A medium to long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction using double gracilis and semitendinosus grafts , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.