In Vivo Brain Water Determination by T1 Measurements: Effect of Total Water Content, Hydration Fraction, and Field Strength

This work is concerned with the accurate quantification of brain water content under routine clinical conditions. Gelatin solutions of varying water content are first employed as a model of an edematous brain and longitudinal relaxation measurements are performed at proton Larmor frequencies of 5, 41, 63, and 100 MHz. These are followed with in vivo measurements in an experimental animal model of brain edema at 41 MHz. The results underscore the dominant role of total water content Win the relaxation process and verify the expected linearity between 1/T1 and 1/W. A scheme is presented and experimentally verified at 41 MHz for deducing the exact relationship of 1/T1 vs 1/W at any frequency. Knowledge of this relationship along with precise measurements of 1/T1 at a given field strength permits quantitative in vivo measures of brain water content to be obtained with a precision of about 0.01. It is concluded that routine, accurate, and noninvasive brain water measurements are possible by magnetic resonance imaging in a clinical environment. © 1991 Academic Press, Inc.

[1]  J L Tocher,et al.  Correlation of human NMR T1 values measured in vivo and brain water content. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  A. Marmarou,et al.  The Brain Response to Infusion Edema: Dynamics of Fluid Resolution , 1982 .

[3]  A. Marmarou,et al.  An improved gravimetric measure of cerebral edema. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  Y Van Haverbeke,et al.  The uncommon longitudinal relaxation dispersion of human brain white matter , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. Fatouros,et al.  An MRI phantom material for quantitative relaxometry , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[7]  J L Potter,et al.  NMR relaxation of protons in tissues and other macromolecular water solutions. , 1982, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  J R MacFall,et al.  Methodology for the measurement and analysis of relaxation times in proton imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  W. Collins,et al.  A comparison of effects of bipolar and monopolar electrocoagulation in brain. , 1981, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  S. H. Koenig,et al.  The importance of the motion of water for magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[11]  I. Klatzo,et al.  Presidental address. Neuropathological aspects of brain edema. , 1967, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[12]  J. Best,et al.  BRAIN WATER MEASURED BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING Correlation with Direct Estimation and Changes After Mannitol and Dexamethasone , 1987, The Lancet.

[13]  F. Noack,et al.  NMR relaxation investigation of water mobility in aqueous bovine serum albumin solutions. , 1976, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[15]  R L Kamman,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in experimental brain edema: Effects of water concentration, protein concentration, and temperature , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R. Vré,et al.  Biomedical implications of the relaxation behaviour of water related to NMR imaging , 1984 .

[17]  M Furuse,et al.  Spin-lattice relaxation times of bound water--its determination and implications for tissue discrimination. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  J. Hennel,et al.  Proton Magnetic Relaxation and Protein Hydration , 1963, Nature.