Relativistic quantum key distribution system with one-way quantum communication

Unambiguous state discrimination (USD) is one of the major obstacles for practical quantum key distribution (QKD). Often overlooked, it allows efficient eavesdropping in majority of practical systems, provided the overall channel loss is above a certain threshold. Thus, to remain secure all such systems must not only monitor the actual loss, but also possess a comprehensive information on the safe ‘loss vs. BER’ levels, which is often well beyond currently known security analyses. The more advanced the protocol the tougher it becomes to find and prove corresponding bounds. To get out of this vicious circle and solve the problem outright, we demonstrate a so called relativistic QKD system, which uses causality to become inherently immune to USD-based attacks. The system proves to be practical in metropolitan line-of-sight arrangements. At the same time it has a very basic structure that allows for a straightforward and comprehensive security analysis.

[1]  Alexander Semenovich Holevo,et al.  Quantum coding theorems , 1998 .

[2]  Raymond M. Sova,et al.  Demonstration of high-data-rate wavelength division multiplexed transmission over a 150-km free space optical link , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Won-Young Hwang.  Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[4]  S. N. Molotkov,et al.  Minimalist design of a robust real-time quantum random number generator , 2015, 1507.02059.

[5]  S. Barnett,et al.  Quantum state discrimination , 2008, 0810.1970.

[6]  Miloslav Dusek,et al.  Unambiguous state discrimination in quantum cryptography with weak coherent states , 2000 .

[7]  Goldenberg,et al.  Quantum cryptography based on orthogonal states. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[8]  Yoshihisa Yamamoto,et al.  Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution using coherent light , 2003 .

[9]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[10]  I. D. Ivanović.  How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1987 .

[11]  Yoshinori Arimoto.  Multi-Gigabit Free-Space Laser Communications Using Compact Optical Terminal with Bidirectional Beacon Tracking , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[12]  David J. Richardson,et al.  Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[13]  J. Kaniewski.  Relativistic quantum cryptography , 2015, 1512.00602.

[14]  Marco Tomamichel,et al.  Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography , 2011, Nature Communications.

[15]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[16]  V. Scarani,et al.  Fast and simple one-way quantum key distribution , 2005, quant-ph/0506097.

[17]  S. N. Molotkov.  On the resistance of relativistic quantum cryptography in open space at finite resources , 2012 .

[18]  R. Renner,et al.  A Generic Security Proof for Quantum Key Distribution , 2004, quant-ph/0402131.

[19]  Yoshinori Arimoto,et al.  Operational condition for direct single-mode-fiber coupled free-space optical terminal under strong atmospheric turbulence , 2012 .

[20]  Xiang‐Bin Wang,et al.  Beating the PNS attack in practical quantum cryptography , 2004 .

[21]  S. Barnett,et al.  Optimum unambiguous discrimination between linearly independent symmetric states , 1998, quant-ph/9807023.

[22]  Shor,et al.  Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol , 2000, Physical review letters.

[23]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2011 .