Impact of Robotic Surgery on Decision Making: Perspectives of Surgical Teams

There has been rapid growth in the purchase of surgical robots in both North America and Europe in recent years. Whilst this technology promises many benefits for patients, the introduction of such a complex interactive system into healthcare practice often results in unintended consequences that are difficult to predict. Decision making by surgeons during an operation is affected by variables including tactile perception, visual perception, motor skill, and instrument complexity, all of which are changed by robotic surgery, yet the impact of robotic surgery on decision making has not been previously studied. Drawing on the approach of realist evaluation, we conducted a multi-site interview study across nine hospitals, interviewing 44 operating room personnel with experience of robotic surgery to gather their perspectives on how robotic surgery impacts surgeon decision making. The findings reveal both potential benefits and challenges of robotic surgery for decision making.

[1]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  When surgeons face intraoperative challenges: a naturalistic model of surgical decision making. , 2013, American journal of surgery.

[2]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. , 2003, The Journal of surgical research.

[3]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Understanding decision making during emergencies: a key contributor to resilience , 2015 .

[4]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Surgeons' intraoperative decision making and risk management. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[5]  R. DeMatteo.  American Journal of Surgery , 1916, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[6]  Eileen Entin,et al.  Robotic Surgery and the Operating Room Team , 2005 .

[7]  Ivana Holloway,et al.  An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer , 2012, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[8]  S. A. Sathyanarayana,et al.  Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  R S Haluck,et al.  Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  N. Kim,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  N Bosanquet,et al.  Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol , 2014, Implementation Science.

[13]  Rhona Flin,et al.  How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  Josefien van Olmen,et al.  Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research , 2012 .

[15]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Cognitive informatics in biomedicine and healthcare , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  M. Makary,et al.  Underreporting of Robotic Surgery Complications , 2015, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[17]  K. J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  N. Emmel.  Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach , 2013 .

[19]  R. Pawson.  Theorizing the interview , 1996 .

[20]  P. McCulloch,et al.  Teamwork and Error in the Operating Room: Analysis of Skills and Roles , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[21]  V. Fazio,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[22]  J. Korndorffer,et al.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[23]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Robotics in surgery , 2002, BMJ.

[24]  David I. Lee,et al.  In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[25]  I. Broeders,et al.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[26]  Sarah Spitz.  Canada lags in using robotic surgery , 2013, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[27]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Alan D. Pearman,et al.  Information sharing during multi-agency major incidents , 2011, ASIST.

[29]  P. McCulloch,et al.  The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[30]  Klasien Horstman,et al.  Understanding the adoption dynamics of medical innovations: affordances of the da Vinci robot in the Netherlands. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[31]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Intra-operative decision making: More than meets the eye , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[32]  Andrew N. Healey,et al.  Teamwork enables remote surgical control and a new model for a surgical system emerges , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[33]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery? , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[34]  David Jayne,et al.  Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century , 2006 .

[35]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Development and Validation of a Surgical Workload Measure: The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) , 2011, World Journal of Surgery.

[36]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. , 2010, Surgery.

[37]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Exploring the potential for touchless interaction in image-guided interventional radiology , 2011, CHI.

[38]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS): Refinement and Application in Urological Surgery , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[39]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons’ perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[40]  E. Salas,et al.  Human Factors : The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society , 2012 .

[41]  T. Krummel,et al.  Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[42]  N. Sevdalis,et al.  Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observedin the operating theatre , 2006, Ergonomics.

[43]  L. Lingard,et al.  Understanding Clinical Uncertainty: What Is Going on When Experienced Surgeons Are Not Sure What to Do? , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[44]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Interaction proxemics and image use in neurosurgery , 2012, CHI.

[45]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Mapping surgical practice decision making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care. , 2008, American journal of surgery.

[46]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[47]  D. Ravizza,et al.  Full Robotic Left Colon and Rectal Cancer Resection: Technique and Early Outcome , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[48]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[49]  Mark Coleman,et al.  Lapco: national training programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2009 .

[50]  Xiao-hui Du,et al.  Robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer: technique and early outcome. , 2013, Chinese medical journal.

[51]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Thinking ahead of the surgeon. An interview study to identify scrub nurses' non-technical skills. , 2011, International journal of nursing studies.

[52]  M. E. Hagen,et al.  Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[53]  T. N. Payne,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Surgery for the Community Gynecologist: Can it Be Adopted? , 2011, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.