Zuhören vs. Lesen: Verständnis literarischer Texte bei Schüler_innen

Abstract This paper investigates the effect of the mode of reception (listening vs. reading) on the comprehension of literary texts of different degrees of linguistic complexity in German, testing schoolchildren in Grade 8. To this end, two texts were used: the grammatically and lexically comparatively more complex novella Das Erdbeben in Chili by Heinrich von Kleist, and the comparatively less complex novella Kleider machen Leute by Gottfried Keller. Thus, in contrast to previous studies on schoolchildren’s reading and listening comprehension, which often use very short texts composed specifically for the purpose of the study, a major aim of the current study is to test authentic literary material, which German students are regularly confronted with at school. Students read or listened to excerpts of these novellas and subsequently filled in a questionnaire containing questions on the correct comprehension of the respective texts, thereby addressing both local and global aspects of comprehension. The results are twofold: First, listening comprehension is better than reading comprehension, regardless of the complexity of the text (i.e. for both the Kleist and the Keller text). Second, the first effect is even stronger for global text comprehension than for comprehension of local details.

[1]  D. J. King,et al.  Complex Methods of Presentation, Internal Consistency of Learning Material, and Accuracy of Written Recall , 1968, Psychological reports.

[2]  Mark A. Sherman,et al.  Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated Sentences. , 1976 .

[3]  Thomas G. Devine Listening and Reading. , 1976 .

[4]  Sandra S. Smiley,et al.  Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation , 1977 .

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Summarizing Stories After Reading and Listening. , 1977 .

[6]  David R. Olson,et al.  Memory and inference in the comprehension of oral and written discourse , 1978 .

[7]  Veda R. Charrow,et al.  Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions , 1979 .

[8]  James M. Royer,et al.  Patterns of individual differences in the development of listening and reading comprehension , 1990 .

[9]  Detlef H. Rost,et al.  Lesen, Hören, Verstehen , 1992 .

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reading and listening to oral‐based versus literate‐based discourse , 2000 .

[11]  Irene-Anna N. Diakidoy,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LISTENING AND READING COMPREHENSION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEXT AT INCREASING GRADE LEVELS , 2005 .

[12]  Michael Eid,et al.  Konstruktion mentaler Repräsentationen beim Hör- und Leseverstehen , 2006, Z. für Medienpsychologie.

[13]  Christian Kürschner,et al.  Das Verhältnis gesprochener und geschriebener Sprache bei der Konstruktion mentaler Repräsentationen , 2008 .

[14]  Anna Volodina,et al.  Intonation und Interpretation von Satzverknüpfungen in literarischen Hörbuchtexten , 2011 .

[15]  Andrew Dobson Learning about Listening , 2014 .

[16]  Michael Krelle,et al.  Hörverstehen - Ein Forschungsüberblick , 2014 .

[17]  U. Draesner Literarisches Lesen , 2015, Lesen. Ein Handapparat.

[18]  Barbara Schlücker,et al.  Literatur lieber hören? : Zum Einfluss des Hörens auf die Rezeptionsmotivation bei literarischen Texten im Deutschunterricht , 2017 .