Investigating the effects of fluidic connection between microbial fuel cells

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can ‘treat’ wastewater but individually are thermodynamically restricted. Scale-up might, therefore, require a plurality of units operating in a stack which could introduce losses simply through fluidic connections. Experiments were performed on two hydraulically joined MFCs (20 cm apart) where feedstock flowed first through the upstream unit (MFCup) and into the downstream unit (MFCdown) to explore the interactive effect of electrical load connection, influent make-up and flow-rate on electrical outputs. This set-up was also used to investigate how calculating total internal resistance based on a dynamic open circuit voltage (OCV) might differ from using the starting OCV. When fed a highly conductive feedstock (~4,800 μS) MFCdown dropped approximately 180 mV as progressively heavier loads were applied to MFCup (independent of flow-rate) due to electron leakages through the medium. The conductivities of plain acetate solutions (5 and 20 mM) were insufficient to induce losses in MFCdown even when MFCup was operating at high current densities. However, at the highest flow-rate (240 mL/h) MFCdown dropped by approximately 100 mV when using 5 and 220 mV using 20 mM acetate. When the distance between MFCs was reduced by 5 cm, voltage drops were apparent even at lower flow-rates, (30 mL/h decreased the voltage by 115 mV when using 20 mM acetate). Shear flow-rates can introduce dissolved oxygen and turbulence all capable of affecting the anodic biofilm and redox conditions. Calculating total internal resistance using a dynamic OCV produced a more stable curve over time compared to that based on the starting constant OCV.

[1]  Li Zhuang,et al.  Substrate cross-conduction effect on the performance of serially connected microbial fuel cell stack , 2009 .

[2]  B. Logan,et al.  Brewery wastewater treatment using air-cathode microbial fuel cells , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[3]  D. Cao,et al.  Electricity generation and modeling of microbial fuel cell from continuous beer brewery wastewater. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Liping Huang,et al.  Electricity generation and treatment of paper recycling wastewater using a microbial fuel cell , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[5]  J. Veerman,et al.  Reducing power losses caused by ionic shortcut currents in reverse electrodialysis stacks by a validated model , 2008 .

[6]  M. Hondzo,et al.  Fluid dynamics impact on bacterial physiology: Biochemical oxygen demand , 2007 .

[7]  B. Min,et al.  Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells. , 2005, Water research.

[8]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Minimizing losses in bio-electrochemical systems: the road to applications , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  S. Okabe,et al.  Continuous power generation and microbial community structure of the anode biofilms in a three-stage microbial fuel cell system , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[10]  C. Melhuish,et al.  Microbial fuel cells based on carbon veil electrodes: Stack configuration and scalability , 2008 .

[11]  Hong Liu,et al.  Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Effects of shear stress on the secretion of extracellular polymeric substances in biofilms , 2005 .

[13]  S. Berchmans,et al.  Bioelectrocatalysis of Acetobacter aceti and Gluconobacter roseus for current generation. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  W. Habermann,et al.  Biological fuel cells with sulphide storage capacity , 1991, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[15]  Alan J Guwy,et al.  Modular tubular microbial fuel cells for energy recovery during sucrose wastewater treatment at low organic loading rate. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[16]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Heterogeneity of biofilms in rotating annular reactors: Occurrence, structure, and consequences , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  Zhigang Qi,et al.  Effect of open circuit voltage on performance and degradation of high temperature PBI–H3PO4 fuel cells , 2006 .

[19]  Ioannis Ieropoulos,et al.  Electricity from landfill leachate using microbial fuel cells: Comparison with a biological aerated filter , 2009 .

[20]  B. Logan,et al.  Effects of applied voltages and dissolved oxygen on sustained power generation by microbial fuel cells. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  Sang-Eun Oh,et al.  Voltage reversal during microbial fuel cell stack operation , 2007 .

[22]  Ioannis Ieropoulos,et al.  Effects of flow-rate, inoculum and time on the internal resistance of microbial fuel cells. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[23]  Youngjin Choi,et al.  Development of Bipolar Plate Stack Type Microbial Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[24]  Bruce E Rittmann,et al.  Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode‐respiring bacteria , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  Electrochemical Reactions in a DMFC under Open-Circuit Conditions , 2005 .

[26]  Minoru Inaba,et al.  Gas crossover and membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2006 .

[27]  F. García-Ochoa,et al.  Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[28]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena , 2002, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.