Development of a hybrid modelling approach for the generation of an urban on-road transportation emission inventory

Abstract The development of accurate emission inventories at an urban scale is of utmost importance for cities in light of climate change commitments and the need to identify the emission reduction potential of various strategies. Emission inventories for on-road transportation are sensitive to the network models used to generate traffic activity data. For large networks (cities or regions), average-speed models have been relied upon extensively in research and practice, primarily due to their computational attractiveness. Nevertheless, these models are myopic to traffic states and driving cycles and therefore lack in accuracy. The aim of this study is to improve the quality of regional on-road emission inventories without resorting to computationally-intensive traffic microsimulation of an entire region. For this purpose, macroscopic, mesoscopic, and microscopic emission models are applied and compared, using average speed, average speed and its standard deviation, and instantaneous speeds. We also propose a hybrid approach called the CLustEr-based Validated Emission Re-calculation (CLEVER), which bridges between the microscopic and mesoscopic approaches. CLEVER defines unsupervised traffic conditions using a combination of mesoscopic traffic characteristics for selected road segments, and identifies a representative emission factor (EF) for each condition based on the microscopic driving cycle of the sample. Regional emissions can then be estimated by classifying segments in the regional network into these conditions, and applying corresponding EFs. The results of the CLEVER method are compared with the results of microsimulation and of mesoscopic approaches revealing a robust methodology that improves the emission inventory while reducing computational burden.

[1]  DionFrancois,et al.  VT-Meso model framework for estimating hot-stabilized light-duty vehicle fuel consumption and emission rates , 2011 .

[2]  Allison DenBleyker,et al.  Comparison of the MOVES2010a, MOBILE6.2, and EMFAC2007 mobile source emission models with on-road traffic tunnel and remote sensing measurements , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  R. Borge,et al.  Comparison of road traffic emission models in Madrid (Spain) , 2012 .

[4]  Werner A. Stahel,et al.  Comparison of a road traffic emission model (HBEFA) with emissions derived from measurements in the Gubrist road tunnel, Switzerland , 2005 .

[5]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  A mesoscopic integrated urban traffic flow-emission model , 2017 .

[6]  L. Ntziachristos,et al.  Validation of road vehicle and traffic emission models – A review and meta-analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Comparison of MOBILE5a, MOBILE6, VT-MICRO, and CMEM models for estimating hot-stabilized light-duty gasoline vehicle emissions , 2003 .

[8]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Development of VT-Micro model for estimating hot stabilized light duty vehicle and truck emissions , 2004 .

[9]  R. Smokers,et al.  A new modelling approach for road traffic emissions : VERSIT+ , 2007 .

[10]  Jungwook Jun Understanding the variability of speed distributions under mixed traffic conditions caused by holiday traffic , 2010 .

[11]  Steve L Mara,et al.  Emission Factors for High-Emitting Vehicles Based on On-Road Measurements of Individual Vehicle Exhaust with a Mobile Measurement Platform , 2011, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  Norbert Ligterink Refined vehicle and driving-behaviour dependencies in the Versit+ emission model , 2009 .

[13]  Joseph Quartieri,et al.  SPEED DISTRIBUTION INFLUENCE IN ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION , 2013 .