PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH SPINE TUMOR OPERATED IN A SOUTH AMERICAN REFERENCE SERVICE. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective was to conduct an analytical epidemiological study to understand the profile, treatment, and outcome of patients with spinal tumors in a Brazilian Quaternary Hospital of the SUS. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of data from the last five years was performed. It was described qualitative characteristics evaluated by absolute and relative frequencies and quantitative characteristics by sintetized measures. Associations between characteristics were verified using chi-square tests or exact tests. Results: 92 patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age was 56.1 years (±14.7), with 48 men (52.2%) and 44 women (47.8%). The types of tumors organized in the three proposed groups had 19 multiple myelomas (20.7%), 62 metastases (67.3%), and 11 other tumors (12%). The neurological status measured through the ASIA score was A: 5.4%, B: 22.8%, C: 26.1%, D: 35.9%, E: 9.8%. Karnofsky was prevalent in the 50-70 range with 65.2%. The total hospitalization period had a mean of 22.8±18 days, preoperatively 11.9±9.2 days, and postoperatively 10.9±14 days. Karnofsky presented lower values according to the worst ASIA (p < 0.001). A total of 12 patients (13%) died during hospitalization. The total and postoperative length of stay was longer in patients who died (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides epidemiological data that allow an understanding of the profile of patients with spinal tumors in the Brazilian Public Health System. The severity of the patients is higher when compared to most of the series cases in the literature. The patients with longer hospitalization stay died. Level of evidence IV; Case series.

[1]  Joni K. Evans,et al.  National trends in the surgical management of metastatic lung cancer to the spine using the national inpatient sample database from 2005 to 2014 , 2021, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Meyer,et al.  Comprehensive surgical treatment strategy for spinal metastases , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Edmar Stieven Filho,et al.  Spinal Metastasis Surgery: A Proposal for a Predictive Model of Morbidity and Mortality * , 2019, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia.

[4]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  The evolution of surgical management for vertebral column tumors. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  R. Shinjo,et al.  Trends of postoperative length of stay in spine surgery over 10 years in Japan based on a prospective multicenter database , 2019, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[6]  C. R. Goodwin,et al.  Predicting survival for metastatic spine disease: a comparison of nine scoring systems. , 2018, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  Shu-Hua Yang,et al.  Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) treated with palliative decompression: Surgical timing and survival rate , 2017, PloS one.

[8]  C. Bettegowda,et al.  Development of a Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI) Using a Nationwide Database and Its Association with Inpatient Morbidity, Mortality, and Length of Stay After Spine Surgery. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[9]  Mark T Hegel,et al.  Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Concurrent Palliative Oncology Care: Patient Outcomes in the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. C. Veiga,et al.  Prognostic Parameters and Spinal Metastases: A Research Study , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Ehud Mendel,et al.  A Novel Classification System for Spinal Instability in Neoplastic Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach and Expert Consensus From the Spine Oncology Study Group , 2009, Spine.

[12]  D. Choi,et al.  Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[13]  V. Ratanatharathorn,et al.  Therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of bone metastasis: a report from the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology. , 2009, Journal of palliative medicine.

[14]  A. Davis,et al.  Motor and sensory assessment of patients in clinical trials for pharmacological therapy of acute spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of the ASIA Standards. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[15]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Epidemiology and demographics for primary vertebral tumors. , 2008, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[16]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Immediate versus delayed chemotherapy in patients with asymptomatic incurable metastatic cancer , 2007 .

[17]  Jefferson Walter Daniel,et al.  Diretrizes no tratamento das metástases epidurais da coluna vertebral. Atualização , 2007, Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery.

[18]  G. Bauman,et al.  Radiopharmaceuticals for the palliation of painful bone metastasis-a systemic review. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  D. Karnofsky,et al.  Comparative aspects of the pharmacology of the antimetabolites. , 1967, Federation proceedings.