Bacteriological Quality of Runoff Water from Pastureland

Runoff from a cow-calf pasture in eastern Nebraska was monitored for total coliforms (TC), fecal coliforms (FC), and fecal streptococci (FS) during 1976, 1977, and 1978. Bacteriological counts in runoff from both grazed and ungrazed areas generally exceeded recommended water quality standards. The FC group was the best indicator group of the impact of grazing. Rainfall runoff from the grazed area contained 5 to 10 times more FC than runoff from the fenced, ungrazed area. There was little difference in TC counts between the two areas, but FS counts were higher in runoff from the ungrazed area and reflected the contributions from wildlife. Recommended bacteriological water quality standards, developed for point source inputs, may be inappropriate for characterizing nonpoint source pollution from pasture runoff. The FC/FS ratio in pasture runoff was useful in identifying the relative contributions of cattle and wildlife. Ratios below 0.05 were indicative of wildlife sources and ratios above 0.1 were characteristic of grazing cattle. Occasions when the FC/FS ratio of diluted cattle waste exceeded one resulted from differential aftergrowth and die-off between FC and FS. The FC/FS ratio and percentage of Streptococcus bovis in pasture runoff are useful indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of livestock management practices for minimizing bacterial contamination of surface water. The importance of choice of medium for the enumeration of FS in runoff derived from cattle wastes is discussed.

[1]  Edwin E. Geldreich,et al.  Fecal coliform and fecal streptococcus density relationships in waste discharges and receiving waters , 1976 .

[2]  E. Berg.  Indicators of viruses in water and food , 1978 .

[3]  J. B. Evans,et al.  Evaluation of selective media for enumeration of group D streptococci in bovine feces. , 1974, Applied microbiology.

[4]  Charles M. Milne,et al.  Effect of a Livestock Wintering Operation on a Western Mountain Stream , 1976 .

[5]  W. S. Lee.  Improved procedure for identification of group D enterococci with two new media. , 1972, Applied microbiology.

[6]  R. Feachem,et al.  An improved role for faecal coliform to faecal streptococci ratios in the differentiation between human and non-human pollution sources , 1975 .

[7]  Geldreich Ee,et al.  Concepts of fecal streptococci in stream pollution. , 1969 .

[8]  M. Brodsky,et al.  Evaluation of Pfizer selective enterococcus and KF media for recovery of fecal streptococci from water by membrane filtration , 1976, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  K. E. Cooper,et al.  Studies in the differentiation between human and animal pollution by means of faecal streptococci. , 1955, Journal of general microbiology.

[10]  S. R. Weibel,et al.  Rural runoff as a factor in stream pollution. , 1969, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[11]  J. W. Robbins,et al.  Stream pollution from animal production units. , 1972, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[12]  F. W. Gilcreas,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. , 1966, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[13]  S. Finegold,et al.  Comparison of Selective Media for Isolation of Presumptive Group D Streptococci from Human Feces , 1971, Applied microbiology.

[14]  L. V. Street,et al.  Bacterial Variations in Streams from a Southwest Idaho Rangeland Watershed , 1978 .

[15]  C. Bartley,et al.  DETECTION AND SANITARY SIGNIFICANCE OF FECAL STREPTOCOCCI IN WATER. , 1964, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[16]  G. McFeters,et al.  Comparative survival of indicator bacteria and enteric pathogens in well water. , 1974, Applied microbiology.

[17]  W. Klein,et al.  Total coliform: fecal coliform ratio for evaluation of raw water bacterial quality. , 1971, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.