Dampening Spontaneous Activity Improves the Light Sensitivity and Spatial Acuity of Optogenetic Retinal Prosthetic Responses

Retinitis pigmentosa is a progressive retinal dystrophy that causes irreversible visual impairment and blindness. Retinal prostheses currently represent the only clinically available vision-restoring treatment, but the quality of vision returned remains poor. Recently, it has been suggested that the pathological spontaneous hyperactivity present in dystrophic retinas may contribute to the poor quality of vision returned by retinal prosthetics by reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of prosthetic responses. Here, we investigated to what extent blocking this hyperactivity can improve optogenetic retinal prosthetic responses. We recorded activity from channelrhodopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells in retinal wholemounts in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Sophisticated stimuli, inspired by those used in clinical visual assessment, were used to assess light sensitivity, contrast sensitivity and spatial acuity of optogenetic responses; in all cases these were improved after blocking spontaneous hyperactivity using meclofenamic acid, a gap junction blocker. Our results suggest that this approach significantly improves the quality of vision returned by retinal prosthetics, paving the way to novel clinical applications. Moreover, the improvements in sensitivity achieved by blocking spontaneous hyperactivity may extend the dynamic range of optogenetic retinal prostheses, allowing them to be used at lower light intensities such as those encountered in everyday life.

[1]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[2]  Michael Z. Lin,et al.  Characterization of engineered channelrhodopsin variants with improved properties and kinetics. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[3]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Sidman,et al.  Differential effect of the rd mutation on rods and cones in the mouse retina. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Long-Term Results from an Epiretinal Prosthesis to Restore Sight to the Blind. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Elena Ivanova,et al.  Block of Gap Junctions Eliminates Aberrant Activity and Restores Light Responses during Retinal Degeneration , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling during retinal degeneration. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[8]  A. Cideciyan,et al.  Genetically engineered large animal model for studying cone photoreceptor survival and degeneration in retinitis pigmentosa , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Siegrid Löwel,et al.  Restoring the ON Switch in Blind Retinas: Opto-mGluR6, a Next-Generation, Cell-Tailored Optogenetic Tool , 2015, PLoS biology.

[10]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[11]  P. Latham,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders , 2001, Nature.

[12]  T. L. McGee,et al.  Search for Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa Genes Using Microarray Analysis of RNA Expression Levels in Lymphoblasts , 2006 .

[13]  S. Liebowitz.  Retinitis pigmentosa. , 1979, Journal - American Intra-Ocular Implant Society.

[14]  Botond Roska,et al.  Gene therapy for blindness. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  E. Berson.  Retinitis pigmentosa. The Friedenwald Lecture. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Konrad Lehmann,et al.  Visual Function in Mice with Photoreceptor Degeneration and Transgenic Expression of Channelrhodopsin 2 in Ganglion Cells , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Z. Pan,et al.  Evaluation of the adeno-associated virus mediated long-term expression of channelrhodopsin-2 in the mouse retina , 2009, Molecular vision.

[18]  B. Jones,et al.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[19]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  A. Dizhoor,et al.  Ectopic Expression of a Microbial-Type Rhodopsin Restores Visual Responses in Mice with Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2006, Neuron.

[21]  W. Beltran.  The use of canine models of inherited retinal degeneration to test novel therapeutic approaches. , 2009, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[22]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Tuning the primary reaction of channelrhodopsin-2 by imidazole, pH, and site-specific mutations. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[23]  B. Roska,et al.  Optogenetic therapy for retinitis pigmentosa , 2011, Gene Therapy.

[24]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Genetic Reactivation of Cone Photoreceptors Restores Visual Responses in Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2010, Science.

[26]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Retinal prosthetic strategy with the capacity to restore normal vision , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Michael P. Andrews,et al.  Developmental time course distinguishes changes in spontaneous and light-evoked retinal ganglion cell activity in rd1 and rd10 mice. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  P. Latham,et al.  Ruling out and ruling in neural codes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Luca Berdondini,et al.  Following the ontogeny of retinal waves: pan-retinal recordings of population dynamics in the neonatal mouse , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Rapid Neural Coding in the Retina with Relative Spike Latencies , 2008, Science.

[31]  Alexander Sumaroka,et al.  Canine Retina Has a Primate Fovea-Like Bouquet of Cone Photoreceptors Which Is Affected by Inherited Macular Degenerations , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  L L SLOAN,et al.  New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. , 1959, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  S. Stasheff,et al.  Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Annette E. Allen,et al.  Restoration of Vision with Ectopic Expression of Human Rod Opsin , 2015, Current Biology.

[35]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Edward S Boyden,et al.  Virally delivered channelrhodopsin-2 safely and effectively restores visual function in multiple mouse models of blindness. , 2011, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[37]  R. Masland,et al.  The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Luca Berdondini,et al.  Spike Detection for Large Neural Populations Using High Density Multielectrode Arrays , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[39]  Mark S. Cembrowski,et al.  Intrinsic bursting of AII amacrine cells underlies oscillations in the rd1 mouse retina. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  C. Cepko.  Emerging Gene Therapies for Retinal Degenerations , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  G. Awatramani,et al.  Origins of spontaneous activity in the degenerating retina , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[42]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS – Clinical trial interim report , 2015, Vision Research.

[43]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Low error discrimination using a correlated population code. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Benjamin R. Arenkiel,et al.  In Vivo Light-Induced Activation of Neural Circuitry in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 , 2007, Neuron.

[45]  Michael H Berry,et al.  Optogenetic Vision Restoration Using Rhodopsin for Enhanced Sensitivity , 2015, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[46]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[47]  Krista I Kinard,et al.  Neural reprogramming in retinal degeneration. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  Zhuo-Hua Pan,et al.  Ectopic Expression of Multiple Microbial Rhodopsins Restores ON and OFF Light Responses in Retinas with Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Patrick Degenaar,et al.  This Work Is Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Blockade of Pathological Retinal Ganglion Cell Hyperactivity Improves Optogenetically Evoked Light Responses in Rd1 Mice , 2022 .

[50]  R. Baldoni,et al.  Aberrant activity in retinal degeneration impairs central visual processing and relies on Cx36-containing gap junctions. , 2016, Experimental eye research.

[51]  J. Barrett,et al.  Optogenetic approaches to retinal prosthesis , 2014, Visual Neuroscience.

[52]  Rufin van Rullen,et al.  Rate Coding Versus Temporal Order Coding: What the Retinal Ganglion Cells Tell the Visual Cortex , 2001, Neural Computation.

[53]  Olivier Marre,et al.  Targeting channelrhodopsin-2 to ON-bipolar cells with vitreally administered AAV Restores ON and OFF visual responses in blind mice. , 2015, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[54]  R. Masland,et al.  Remodeling of cone photoreceptor cells after rod degeneration in rd mice. , 2009, Experimental eye research.

[55]  Pierre Kornprobst,et al.  Rank Order Coding: a Retinal Information Decoding Strategy Revealed by Large-Scale Multielectrode Array Retinal Recordings , 2016, eNeuro.

[56]  Toru Ishizuka,et al.  Visual Properties of Transgenic Rats Harboring the Channelrhodopsin-2 Gene Regulated by the Thy-1.2 Promoter , 2009, PloS one.

[57]  K. Narfström.  Hereditary progressive retinal atrophy in the Abyssinian cat. , 1983, The Journal of heredity.

[58]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[59]  P. Greenberg,et al.  Retinal implants: a systematic review , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[60]  Douglas S Kim,et al.  Light-activated channels targeted to ON bipolar cells restore visual function in retinal degeneration , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  Bill Bynum,et al.  Lancet , 2015, The Lancet.

[62]  Eriko Sugano,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2 gene transduced into retinal ganglion cells restores functional vision in genetically blind rats. , 2010, Experimental eye research.

[63]  Nancy Carlson,et al.  Clinical Procedures for Ocular Examination , 1990 .

[64]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.