A competition model for two CPU vendors

In a severely competing economic environment, the competing ability of a company must be improved continuously as the reaction to the outer competition pressure. We propose a model developed from Lotka–Volterra competition model with time dependent parameters other than the equilibrium theory so as to describe some characteristics of the technology innovation. The time-dependent parameters comprise carrying capacities and competitive effects. We assume that the technological index is represented, in some degree, by the highest CPU clock frequency. We have quantitatively studied quarterly revenues of AMD and Intel, two chief vendors of the central processing unit (CPU). Moreover, we give the empirical values of the basic parameter set according to theoretical analysis and our simulation results fit the revenue data with reasonable agreement. It demonstrates that the model is capable of describing some important commercial phenomena in certain technology-leading industries. The technology innovation but not the strategy, is the crucial factor of competition, and the first-mover advantage will not be always unbroken. Furthermore, we have found that the unwilling mutualism appeared in the present model cannot be explained by the strategic behavior theory.

[1]  Zhibin Zhang,et al.  Mutualism or cooperation among competitors promotes coexistence and competitive ability , 2003 .

[2]  Massimo Motta,et al.  Cooperative R&D and vertical product differentiation , 1992 .

[3]  Product market competition, R&D, and welfare , 2002 .

[4]  Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira,et al.  General Equilibrium Concepts under Imperfect Competition: A Cournotian Approach , 1997 .

[5]  J. Matheron The welfare cost of monopolistic competition revisited , 2002 .

[6]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  A lotka-volterra model of coexistence between a sexual population and multiple asexual clones. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Transient dynamics and food–web complexity in the Lotka–Volterra cascade model , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[9]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  A homothetic utility function for monopolistic competition models, without constant price elasticity , 2003 .

[10]  Philip Wolfe,et al.  Contributions to the theory of games , 1953 .

[11]  Miguel A. F. Sanjuán,et al.  Complex networks and the WWW market , 2003 .

[12]  J C G Wright,et al.  Monopolistic Competition Theory , 1969 .

[13]  Ping Chen Origin of the division of labour and a stochastic mechanism of differentiation , 1987 .

[14]  A. Babloyantz,et al.  Self-organization, emerging properties, and learning , 1991 .

[15]  Sorin Moga,et al.  Imitation: learning and communication , 2000 .

[16]  Donald B. Gillies,et al.  3. Solutions to General Non-Zero-Sum Games , 1959 .

[17]  Miguel A. F. Sanjuán,et al.  Defining strategies to win in the Internet market , 2001 .

[18]  Ping Chen,et al.  Imitation, Learning, and Communication: Central or Polarized Patterns in Collective Actions , 1991 .

[19]  A. Sikder A Lotka–Volterra competition model and its global convergence to a definite axial equilibrium , 2002, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  R. Liptser,et al.  Some Results on the Lotka–Volterra Model and its Small Random Perturbations , 2003 .

[21]  V. Tkachenko,et al.  On Impulsive Lotka–Volterra Systems with Diffusion , 2002 .

[22]  A. White,et al.  The adaptive dynamics of Lotka-Volterra systems with trade-offs. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[23]  Jesse H. Ausubel,et al.  A Primer on Logistic Growth and Substitution: The Mathematics of the Loglet Lab Software , 1999 .

[24]  Chang-Hyeon Choi Generalizations of the Lotka-Volterra Population Ecology Model: Theory, Simulation, and Applications , 1997 .

[25]  P. Krugman Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade , 1980 .

[26]  E. Chamberlin The Theory of Monopolistic Competition , 1933 .