Designing Operationally Relevant Daily Large Fire Containment Strategies Using Risk Assessment Results

In this study, we aim to advance the optimization of daily large fire containment strategies for ground-based suppression resources by leveraging fire risk assessment results commonly used by fire managers in the western USA. We begin from an existing decision framework that spatially overlays fire risk assessment results with pre-identified potential wildland fire operational delineations (PODs), and then clusters PODs into a response POD (rPOD) using a mixed integer program (MIP) model to minimize expected loss. We improve and expand upon this decision framework through enhanced fire modeling integration and refined analysis of probabilistic and time-sensitive information. Specifically, we expand the set of data inputs to include raster layers of simulated burn probability, flame length probability, fire arrival time, and expected net value change, all calculated using a common set of stochastic weather forecasts and landscape data. Furthermore, we develop a secondary optimization model that, for a given optimal rPOD, dictates the timing of fire line construction activities to ensure completion of containment line prior to fire arrival along specific rPOD edges. The set of management decisions considered includes assignment of PODs to be included in the rPOD, assignment of suppression resources to protect susceptible structures within the rPOD, and assignment of suppression resources to construct fire lines, on specific days, along the perimeter of the rPOD. We explore how fire manager risk preferences regarding firefighter safety affect optimal rPOD characteristics, and use a simple decision tree to display multiple solutions and support rapid assessment of alternatives. We base our test cases on the FSPro simulation of the 2017 Sliderock Fire that burned on the Lolo National Forest in Montana, USA. The overarching goal of this research is to generate operationally relevant decision support that can best balance the benefits and losses from wildfire and the cost from responding to wildfire.

[1]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A simulation and optimisation procedure to model daily suppression resource transfers during a fire season in Colorado , 2017 .

[2]  Emily Jane Davis,et al.  Categorizing the Social Context of the Wildland Urban Interface: Adaptive Capacity for Wildfire and Community "Archetypes" , 2015 .

[3]  Jim McLennan,et al.  Decision Making Effectiveness in Wildfire Incident Management Teams , 2006 .

[4]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Development and application of a geospatial wildfire exposure and risk calculation tool , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Joseph Y. J. Chow,et al.  Resource Location and Relocation Models with Rolling Horizon Forecasting for Wildland Fire Planning , 2011, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[6]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  An empirical machine learning method for predicting potential fire control locations for pre-fire planning and operational fire management , 2017 .

[7]  David E. Calkin,et al.  External human factors in incident management team decisionmaking and their effect on large fire suppression expenditures , 2008 .

[8]  Yu Wei,et al.  Examining dispatching practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to reduce seasonal travel distance and manage fatigue , 2018 .

[9]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Rethinking the Wildland Fire Management System , 2018, Journal of Forestry.

[10]  Cody R. Evers,et al.  Archetypes of community wildfire exposure from national forests of the western US , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[11]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Analyzing Wildfire Suppression Difficulty in Relation to Protection Demand , 2018, Environmental Risks.

[12]  Lisa M. Elenz,et al.  Developing the US Wildland Fire Decision Support System , 2011 .

[13]  Yu Wei,et al.  A stochastic mixed integer program to model spatial wildfire behavior and suppression placement decisions with uncertain weather , 2016 .

[14]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A framework for developing safe and effective large-fire response in a new fire management paradigm , 2017 .

[15]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Integrated wildfire risk assessment: Framework development and application on the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana, USA , 2013, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[16]  Crystal S. Stonesifer,et al.  Wildfire Response Performance Measurement: Current and Future Directions , 2018, Fire.

[17]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  A Method for Ensemble Wildland Fire Simulation , 2011 .

[18]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  Two-stage stochastic mixed-integer nonlinear programming model for post-wildfire debris flow hazard management: Mitigation and emergency evacuation , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Application of Wildfire Risk Assessment Results to Wildfire Response Planning in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2016 .

[20]  James P. Minas,et al.  An integrated optimization model for fuel management and fire suppression preparedness planning , 2013, Annals of Operations Research.

[21]  Matthew P. Thompson.  Modeling Wildfire Incident Complexity Dynamics , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  David J. Strauss,et al.  Modeling Wildland Fire Containment With Uncertain Flame Length and Fireline Width , 1993 .

[23]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Evaluate Alternative Wildfire Suppression Strategies , 2018 .

[24]  James P. Minas,et al.  A mixed integer programming approach for asset protection during escaped wildfires , 2015 .

[25]  David L. Martell,et al.  A Review of Initial Attack Fire Crew Productivity and Effectiveness , 1996 .

[26]  A. Pacheco,et al.  Operational flexibility in forest fire prevention and suppression: a spatially explicit intra-annual optimization analysis, considering prevention, (pre)suppression, and escape costs , 2018, European Journal of Forest Research.

[27]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 10-2011 A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States , 2017 .

[28]  Lewis Ntaimo,et al.  A Simulation and Stochastic Integer Programming Approach to Wildfire Initial Attack Planning , 2013 .

[29]  Yu Wei,et al.  A mixed integer program to model spatial wildfire behavior and suppression placement decisions , 2015 .

[30]  NtaimoLewis,et al.  A stochastic programming standard response model for wildfire initial attack planning , 2012 .

[31]  Kevin G. Tolhurst,et al.  Operational wildfire suppression modelling: a review evaluating development, state of the art and future directions , 2015 .

[32]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Modeling Fuel Treatment Leverage: Encounter Rates, Risk Reduction, and Suppression Cost Impacts , 2017 .

[33]  Matt P. Plucinski,et al.  Fighting Flames and Forging Firelines: Wildfire Suppression Effectiveness at the Fire Edge , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[34]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Towards enhanced risk management: Planning, decision making and monitoring of US wildfire response , 2017 .

[35]  Melih Özlen,et al.  An Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search for asset protection during escaped wildfires , 2018, Comput. Oper. Res..

[36]  Yu Wei,et al.  Spatial optimization of operationally relevant large fire confine and point protection strategies: model development and test cases , 2018 .

[37]  J. Carlson,et al.  A decision-making framework for wildfire suppression , 2012 .

[38]  Eric L. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity of fire size to fireline construction rates in a simulation model , 1986 .

[39]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Getting Ahead of the Wildfire Problem: Quantifying and Mapping Management Challenges and Opportunities , 2016 .

[40]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Deploying Wildland Fire Suppression Resources with a Scenario-Based Standard Response Model , 2007, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[41]  Melih Özlen,et al.  Dynamic rerouting of vehicles during cooperative wildfire response operations , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[42]  David L. Martell,et al.  A Review of Recent Forest and Wildland Fire Management Decision Support Systems Research , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[43]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire , 2005 .