Social Capital as a Complexity Reduction Mechanism for Decision Making in Large Scale Open Systems

A common requirement of distributed multi-agent systems is for the agents themselves to negotiate pairwise agreements on performing a joint action. In systems with endogenous resources, the cost of computing the decision-making has to be taken into account. If the computational resources expended in negotiating an optimal solution exceed the marginal benefits gained from that negotiation, then it would be more expedient and efficient to use the memory of past interactions to short-cut the complexity of decision-making in joint or collective actions of this kind. In social systems, it has been observed that social capital is an attribute of individuals that enhances their ability to solve collective action problems. In this paper, we define a new computational framework for representing and reasoning about electronic social capital, in which actions enhance or diminish three different forms of social capital (individual trustworthiness, social network, and institutions), and a decision-making model which uses social capital to decide whether to cooperate or defect in strategic games. A set of scenarios are presented where we believe that social capital can support effective collective action sustained over time, avoid suboptimal dominant strategies, and short-cut the computational costs involved in repetitious solving of strategic games.

[1]  Andrzej Nowak,et al.  The Reinvention of Social Capital for Socio-Technical Systems [Special Section Introduction] , 2014, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[2]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Foundations of Social Capital , 2003 .

[3]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Axiomatization of Socio-Economic Principles for Self-Organizing Institutions: Concepts, Experiments and Challenges , 2012, TAAS.

[4]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[5]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[6]  L. Lachmann,et al.  Capital and its structure , 1956 .

[7]  Pengcheng Zhang,et al.  A novel multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for job scheduling in Grid computing , 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[8]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Reinventing Forgiveness: A Formal Investigation of Moral Facilitation , 2005, iTrust.

[9]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[10]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Animation of Self-Organising Resource Allocation Using Presage2 , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[11]  Andrew J. I. Jones On the concept of trust , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Wolfgang Reif,et al.  A Trust- and Cooperation-Based Solution of a Dynamic Resource Allocation Problem , 2013, 2013 IEEE 7th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[13]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Self Organising Flexible Demand for Smart Grid , 2013, 2013 IEEE 7th International Conference on Self-Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops.

[14]  R. Putnam The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[15]  Alexander Artikis Dynamic specification of open agent systems , 2012, J. Log. Comput..

[16]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Self-Organising Common-Pool Resource Allocation and Canons of Distributive Justice , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[17]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Governing the commons , 1990 .

[18]  K. Taylor Natural justice. , 1998, The Lamp.

[19]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  The Complexity of Computing a Nash Equilibrium , 2009, SIAM J. Comput..

[20]  Jörg Hähner,et al.  Self-Organisation and Evolution for Trust-Adaptive Grid Computing Agents , 2014, Evolution, Complexity and Artificial Life.