Recent advances of computational studies on bioethanol to light olefin reactions using zeolite and metal oxide catalysts
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dong Liu | Chao Ma | Wei Xia | Kun Chen | Chen Qian | Yaxin Huang | Yueling Fan | Xue Wang | Shuang Li
[1] Changxi Miao,et al. Sm-CeO2/Zeolite Bifunctional Catalyst for Direct and Highly Selective Conversion of Bioethanol to Propylene , 2022, Catalysts.
[2] P. E. Strizhak,et al. Processes of Propene Production from Ethanol: Catalysts, Reaction Pathways and Thermodynamic Aspects: A Review , 2022, Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry.
[3] C. Cramer,et al. Multireference Methods are Realistic and Useful Tools for Modeling Catalysis , 2022, Israel Journal of Chemistry.
[4] M. Parrinello,et al. Discover, Sample, and Refine: Exploring Chemistry with Enhanced Sampling Techniques. , 2022, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[5] T. Roukas,et al. From food industry wastes to second generation bioethanol: a review , 2022, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.
[6] Yang Hong,et al. Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning in Catalysts , 2021, Catalysts.
[7] Michael Roemelt,et al. Modern multireference methods and their application in transition metal chemistry. , 2021, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[8] G. Busca,et al. (Bio)Propylene production processes: A critical review , 2021 .
[9] Wei Xia,et al. Ethylene and Propylene Production from Ethanol over Sr/ZSM-5 Catalysts: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study , 2021 .
[10] D. Allen,et al. Ethanol from Sugarcane and the Brazilian Biomass-Based Energy and Chemicals Sector , 2021 .
[11] Jinan Wang,et al. Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Principles and applications , 2021, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.
[12] Sheng Han,et al. Understanding the Nanoconfinement Effect on the Ethanol-to-Propene Mechanism Catalyzed by Acidic ZSM-5 and FAU Zeolites , 2021 .
[13] D. Jiang,et al. Ethanol Conversion over La0.7Sr0.3MnO3–x(100): Autocatalysis, Adjacent O-Vacancies, Disproportionation, and Dehydrogenation , 2020 .
[14] Raudah Lazim,et al. Advances in Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Enhanced Sampling Methods for the Study of Protein Systems , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.
[15] Ignacio Funes‐Ardoiz,et al. Established and Emerging Computational Tools to Study Homogeneous Catalysis—From Quantum Mechanics to Machine Learning , 2020, Chem.
[16] C. Len,et al. Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol: Recent advances, technology trends, and barriers to industrial development , 2020 .
[17] H. Kulik,et al. Rapid Detection of Strong Correlation with Machine Learning for Transition-Metal Complex High-Throughput Screening. , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[18] E. F. S. Aguiar,et al. The role of MPV reaction in the synthesis of propene from ethanol through the acetone route , 2020 .
[19] Zili Wu,et al. Understanding the conversion of ethanol to propene on In2O3 from first principles , 2020 .
[20] Richard A. Cunha,et al. Zooming in on the O-O Bond Formation-An Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Study Applying Enhanced Sampling Techniques. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[21] R. Weber,et al. Ethanol as a Renewable Building Block for Fuels and Chemicals , 2020 .
[22] A. Alexandrova,et al. Ensembles of Metastable States Govern Heterogeneous Catalysis on Dynamic Interfaces. , 2020, Accounts of chemical research.
[23] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Quantum computational chemistry , 2018, Reviews of Modern Physics.
[24] Wei Xia,et al. Highly Selective Lanthanum-Modified Zirconia Catalyst for the Conversion of Ethanol to Propylene: A Combined Experimental and Simulation Study , 2020, Catalysis Letters.
[25] Yi Isaac Yang,et al. Enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics. , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.
[26] C. Cramer,et al. Beyond Density Functional Theory: The Multiconfigurational Approach To Model Heterogeneous Catalysis , 2019, ACS Catalysis.
[27] Guohui Li,et al. Advances in enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations for biomolecules , 2019, Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics.
[28] Changxi Miao,et al. Sc2O3-promoted composite of In2O3 and Beta zeolite for direct conversion of bio-ethanol to propylene , 2019, Fuel Processing Technology.
[29] J. Martins,et al. Methanol, ethanol, propanol, and butanol adsorption on H-ZSM-5 zeolite: an ONIOM study , 2019, Journal of Molecular Modeling.
[30] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing. , 2018, Chemical reviews.
[31] K. Vogiatzis,et al. Computational Approach to Molecular Catalysis by 3d Transition Metals: Challenges and Opportunities , 2018, Chemical reviews.
[32] H. Kulik. Making machine learning a useful tool in the accelerated discovery of transition metal complexes , 2019, WIREs Computational Molecular Science.
[33] Thomas J. Schwartz,et al. Catalytic Conversion of Ethanol to Commodity and Specialty Chemicals , 2019, Ethanol.
[34] Wei Xia,et al. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations of Ethanol Conversion to Propylene Over Zeolite Catalysts , 2018, Front. Mater..
[35] Wei Xia,et al. High Performance SiO2–ZrO2 Binary Oxide for Ethanol Conversion to Ethylene , 2018, Catalysis Letters.
[36] L. G. Appel,et al. Synthesis of Propene from Ethanol: A Mechanistic Study , 2018 .
[37] Liang Zhihao,et al. A combined experimental and theoretical study on ethanol conversion to propylene over Y/ZrO 2 catalyst , 2018 .
[38] Wei Xia,et al. Experimental and Molecular Simulation Studies on Ethanol Conversion to Propylene Over Different Zeolite Catalyst , 2018, Catalysis Letters.
[39] Edit Cséfalvay,et al. Catalytic Conversion of Carbohydrates to Initial Platform Chemicals: Chemistry and Sustainability. , 2017, Chemical reviews.
[40] Changxi Miao,et al. Direct conversion of bio-ethanol to propylene in high yield over the composite of In2O3 and zeolite beta , 2017 .
[41] Wei Xia,et al. Ethylene and propylene production from ethanol over Sr or Bi modified ZrO2 catalysts , 2017, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis.
[42] Wei Xia,et al. Transformation of ethanol to propylene on ZrO2 catalysts: effect of reaction conditions on the catalytic performance , 2017, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis.
[43] Yuji Sugita,et al. Neural Network and Nearest Neighbor Algorithms for Enhancing Sampling of Molecular Dynamics. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[44] Lijiang Yang,et al. Polarization Effects on the Cellulose Dissolution in Ionic Liquids: Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Polarization Model and Integrated Tempering Enhanced Sampling Method. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[45] Wei Xia,et al. Catalytic performance of H-ZSM-5 zeolites for conversion of ethanol or ethylene to propylene: Effect of reaction pressure and SiO2/Al2O3 ratio , 2017 .
[46] Wei Xia,et al. Highly selective catalytic conversion of ethanol to propylene over yttrium-modified zirconia catalyst , 2017 .
[47] L. G. Appel,et al. The first step of the propylene generation from renewable raw material: Acetone from ethanol employing CeO2 doped by Ag , 2017 .
[48] F. Rezaei,et al. Light olefins from renewable resources: Selective catalytic dehydration of bioethanol to propylene over zeolite and transition metal oxide catalysts , 2016 .
[49] Ejm Emiel Hensen,et al. Computational Chemistry of Zeolite Catalysis , 2016 .
[50] Chao Duan,et al. Coking behaviors and kinetics on HZSM-5/SAPO-34 catalysts for conversion of ethanol to propylene , 2016 .
[51] Wei Xia,et al. Effects of particle size on catalytic conversion of ethanol to propylene over H-ZSM-5 catalysts—Smaller is better , 2016 .
[52] Jana Fuhrmann,et al. Reviews In Computational Chemistry , 2016 .
[53] Hong Jiang,et al. Ab initio molecular dynamics with enhanced sampling for surface reaction kinetics at finite temperatures: CH2⇌ CH + H on Ni(111) as a case study. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.
[54] Riguang Zhang,et al. The effect of anatase TiO2 surface structure on the behavior of ethanol adsorption and its initial dissociation step: A DFT study , 2015 .
[55] Rafael C. Bernardi,et al. Enhanced sampling techniques in molecular dynamics simulations of biological systems. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[56] Travis V. Harris,et al. The ONIOM Method and Its Applications. , 2015, Chemical reviews.
[57] M. Iwamoto. Selective catalytic conversion of bio-ethanol to propene: A review of catalysts and reaction pathways , 2015 .
[58] D. Vlachos,et al. DFT-driven multi-site microkinetic modeling of ethanol conversion to ethylene and diethyl ether on γ-Al 2 O 3 (1 1 1) , 2015 .
[59] Dirk P. Kroese,et al. Why the Monte Carlo method is so important today , 2014 .
[60] Shota Mizuno,et al. Pulse and IR Study on the Reaction Pathways for the Conversion of Ethanol to Propene over Scandium-Loaded Indium Oxide Catalysts , 2014 .
[61] M. Probst,et al. Density Functional Theory Study of the Dehydrogenation of Ethanol to Acetaldehyde over the Au-Exchanged ZSM-5 Zeolite: Effect of Surface Oxygen , 2014 .
[62] A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al. Thermodynamic appraisal of the gas phase conversion of ethylene or ethanol to propylene , 2014 .
[63] Adrian J Mulholland,et al. Comparison of ab Initio, DFT, and Semiempirical QM/MM Approaches for Description of Catalytic Mechanism of Hairpin Ribozyme. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[64] Junming Sun,et al. Recent Advances in Catalytic Conversion of Ethanol to Chemicals , 2014 .
[65] T. Fujitani,et al. Difference between the mechanisms of propylene production from methanol and ethanol over ZSM-5 catalysts , 2013 .
[66] N. Rösch,et al. Decomposition of Ethanol Over Ru(0001): A DFT Study , 2013, Topics in Catalysis.
[67] M. W. van der Kamp,et al. Combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods in computational enzymology. , 2013, Biochemistry.
[68] Wei Liu,et al. Production of propylene from ethanol over ZSM-5 co-modified with zirconium and phosphorus , 2013, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis.
[69] Fumitaka Hayashi,et al. Yttrium-Modified Ceria As a Highly Durable Catalyst for the Selective Conversion of Ethanol to Propene and Ethene , 2013 .
[70] Y. Ide,et al. Conversion of Ethanol into Propylene over TON Type Zeolite , 2013 .
[71] G. Groenhof. Introduction to QM/MM simulations. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.
[72] M. Iwamoto,et al. One-path and Selective Conversion of Ethanol to Propene on Scandium-modified Indium Oxide Catalysts , 2012 .
[73] T. Fujitani,et al. Effects of added phosphorus on conversion of ethanol to propylene over ZSM-5 catalysts , 2012 .
[74] T. Meng,et al. The effect of crystal sizes of HZSM-5 zeolites in ethanol conversion to propylene , 2012 .
[75] Y. Ide,et al. Conversion of ethanol to propylene over HZSM-5(Ga) co-modified with lanthanum and phosphorous , 2012 .
[76] Weitao Yang,et al. Challenges for density functional theory. , 2012, Chemical reviews.
[77] Chao Duan,et al. Hydrothermally Synthesized HZSM-5/SAPO-34 Composite Zeolite Catalyst for Ethanol Conversion to Propylene , 2011 .
[78] Xinwen Guo,et al. C2–C4 light olefins from bioethanol catalyzed by Ce-modified nanocrystalline HZSM-5 zeolite catalysts , 2011 .
[79] Y. Ide,et al. Effect of acidity of ZSM-5 zeolite on conversion of ethanol to propylene , 2011 .
[80] J. Harvey,et al. The coupled-cluster description of electronic structure: perspectives for bioinorganic chemistry , 2011, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry.
[81] J. Bilbao,et al. Kinetic modelling for the transformation of bioethanol into olefins on a hydrothermally stable Ni–HZSM-5 catalyst considering the deactivation by coke , 2011 .
[82] K. Murata,et al. Metal modification effects on ethanol conversion to propylene by H-ZSM-5 with Si/Al2 ratio of 150 , 2010 .
[83] T. Fujitani,et al. Study of active sites on the MFI zeolite catalysts for the transformation of ethanol into propylene , 2010 .
[84] T. Fujitani,et al. Conversion of ethanol to propylene over HZSM-5 type zeolites containing alkaline earth metals , 2010 .
[85] H. Vezin,et al. Mechanistic insights on the ethanol transformation into hydrocarbons over HZSM-5 zeolite , 2010 .
[86] K. Murata,et al. Catalytic conversion of ethanol to propylene by H-ZSM-11 , 2010 .
[87] Heng Li,et al. Lanthanum–phosphorous modified HZSM-5 catalysts in dehydration of ethanol to ethylene: A comparative analysis , 2010 .
[88] K. Murata,et al. Conversion of Ethanol to Propylene by H-ZSM-5 with Si/Al2 Ratio of 280 , 2010 .
[89] P. Magnoux,et al. Ethanol transformation over HFAU, HBEA and HMFI zeolites presenting similar Brønsted acidity , 2009 .
[90] J. Šponer,et al. Theoretical studies of RNA catalysis: hybrid QM/MM methods and their comparison with MD and QM. , 2009, Methods.
[91] T. Fujitani,et al. Production of Propylene from Ethanol Over ZSM-5 Zeolites , 2009 .
[92] Hongxing Lei,et al. Improved sampling methods for molecular simulation. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.
[93] M. Waroquier,et al. Global DFT-based reactivity indicators: An assessment of theoretical procedures in zeolite catalysis , 2007 .
[94] D. Truhlar,et al. QM/MM: what have we learned, where are we, and where do we go from here? , 2007 .
[95] F. Solymosi,et al. Aromatization of ethanol on Mo2C/ZSM catalysts , 2006 .
[96] Thom Vreven,et al. Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[97] S. Goedecker. Minima hopping: an efficient search method for the global minimum of the potential energy surface of complex molecular systems. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.
[98] Alexis T. Bell,et al. Challenges for the application of quantum chemical calculations to problems in catalysis , 2004 .
[99] Yuko Okamoto,et al. Generalized-ensemble algorithms: enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[100] Norbert Attig,et al. Introduction to Molecular Dynamics Simulation , 2004 .
[101] E. Lipparini. The Density Functional Theory (DFT) , 2003 .
[102] A. V. Duin,et al. ReaxFF: A Reactive Force Field for Hydrocarbons , 2001 .
[103] V. Barone,et al. Modeling Polymerization Reactions at Aluminum-Based Catalysts: Is DFT a Reliable Computational Tool? , 2001 .
[104] Jerzy Leszczynski,et al. Electronic properties, hydrogen bonding, stacking, and cation binding of DNA and RNA bases , 2001, Biopolymers.
[105] Mark S. Gordon,et al. The Effective Fragment Potential Method: A QM-Based MM Approach to Modeling Environmental Effects in Chemistry , 2001 .
[106] S. Niu,et al. Theoretical studies on reactions of transition-metal complexes. , 2000, Chemical reviews.
[107] P Hobza,et al. Structure, energetics, and dynamics of the nucleic Acid base pairs: nonempirical ab initio calculations. , 1999, Chemical reviews.
[108] Robert G. Parr,et al. Density Functional Theory of Electronic Structure , 1996 .
[109] P. Kollman,et al. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .
[110] H. Berendsen,et al. COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS - METHODOLOGY, APPLICATIONS, AND PERSPECTIVES IN CHEMISTRY , 1990 .
[111] F. L. Pilar,et al. Elementary Quantum Chemistry , 1968 .
[112] P. Hohenberg,et al. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas , 1964 .
[113] G. G. Hall. Applications of quantum mechanics in theoretical chemistry , 1959 .
[114] W. G. P.,et al. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: with Applications to Chemistry , 1935, Nature.
[115] Justin Schwartz. Engineering , 1929, Nature.