The ability of 29 barley cultivars to compete and withstand competition

Abstract Using competitive crops and cultivars can be an important integrated weed management (IWM) tool, useful in both conventional and low-external-input (LEI) farming systems. Barley is considered a competitive crop, but cultivar competitiveness varies. There are two aspects of cultivar competitive ability; the ability to compete (AC) and the ability to withstand competition (AWC). However, the relationship between these aspects has not been addressed in barley. A study was conducted to explore aspects of barley cultivar competitive ability with oats, and to examine the feasibility of ranking cultivars based on either, or both, AWC and AC. Field trials were undertaken in 2001 and 2002 to determine cultivar competitive ability for 29 barley cultivars commonly grown on the Canadian prairies. Cultivars were selected from semidwarf and full height, hulled and hull-less, 2- and 6-row, and feed and malt classes. Yield loss ranged from 6 to 79% while weed seed return ranged from 10 to 83% of gross yield. As a class, semidwarf and hull-less cultivars were less competitive than full height and hulled cultivars, respectively. However, considerable variation existed within these classes, and an absolute relationship between class membership and competitive ability did not exist. Ability to withstand competition was significantly correlated with ability to compete, but correlation coefficients were not strong enough to attempt reliable co-selection within a breeding program. Ability to compete was a more consistent measure of competitive ability than AWC. Ranking barley cultivar competitive ability would make it a valuable IWM tool for farmers and extension personnel. Nomenclature: Barley, Hordeum vulgare L.; oat, Avena sativa L. cv. AC Assiniboia.

[1]  F. Forcella,et al.  Application of Weed Seedbank Ecology to Low-Input Crop Management. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Orla M. Nazarko,et al.  Pesticide Free Production of Field Crops , 2003 .

[3]  Yeshajahu Pomeranz,et al.  Food uses of barley , 1974 .

[4]  R. E. Blackshaw,et al.  Effect of Seeding Dates and Densities of Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the Growth and Productivity of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) , 1981, Weed Science.

[5]  L. Bourgeois,et al.  Impact of threshing on hard red spring wheat seed vigour , 1996 .

[6]  Mokhtari,et al.  Seasonal and site variability in the tolerance of wheat cultivars to interference from Lolium rigidum , 1998 .

[7]  P. Milberg,et al.  Variation in seed dormancy among mother plants, populations and years of seed collection , 1998, Seed Science Research.

[8]  G. Clayton,et al.  Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Interference in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is Influenced by Barley Variety and Seeding Rate1 , 2000, Weed Technology.

[9]  E. Satorre,et al.  A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua L. , 1992 .

[10]  John M. Martin,et al.  Genotype of wheat and barley affects light penetration and wild oat growth. , 1997 .

[11]  K. Landa,et al.  Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition , 1991 .

[12]  R. Richards,et al.  Variation in early vigor between wheat and barley , 1995 .

[13]  Deirdre Lemerle,et al.  Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds , 2001 .

[14]  A. I. Hsiao,et al.  Wild oat and barley interactions: varietal differences in competitiveness in relation to phosphorus supply , 1989 .

[15]  Christopher H. Achen.  Interpreting and Using Regression , 1982 .

[16]  C. Swanton,et al.  Weed Science Beyond the Weeds: The Role of Integrated Weed Management (IWM) in Agroecosystem Health , 1996, Weed Science.

[17]  U. Didon.  Variation Between Barley Cultivars in Early Response to Weed Competition , 2002 .

[18]  B. Klepper,et al.  Comparative Above-Ground Development Rates for Several Annual Grass Weeds and Cereal Grains , 1995, Weed Science.

[19]  G. P. Seavers,et al.  Crop canopy development and structure influence weed suppression , 1999 .

[20]  B. Verbeek,et al.  Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum , 2001 .

[21]  C. Lemieux,et al.  Determination of allelochemicals in spring cereal cultivars of different competitiveness , 1999, Weed Science.

[22]  G. J. Mitchell,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach , 1981 .

[23]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  The use of Biologically Realistic Equations to Describe the Effects of Weed Density and Relative Time of Emergence on Crop Yield , 1987, Weed Science.

[24]  Bahman Shafii,et al.  Wild Oat (Avena fatua) and Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Density Affect Spring Barley Grain Yield , 1991, Weed Technology.

[25]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models , 1985, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  D. J. Finney.  Was This in Your Statistics Textbook? V. Transformation of Data , 1989, Experimental Agriculture.

[27]  H. Doll,et al.  Effect of crop density on competition by wheat and barley with Agrostemma githago and other weeds , 1995 .

[28]  Svend Christensen,et al.  Crop weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties , 1994 .

[29]  Leon G. Higley,et al.  Illuminating the Black Box: The Relationship Between Injury and Yield , 2000 .

[30]  D. Jayas,et al.  Effects of storage conditions on quality loss of hull-less and hulled oats and barley , 1999 .

[31]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Competition of Wild Oat in Wheat and Barley , 1968, Weed Science.

[32]  Svend Christensen,et al.  Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties , 2006 .

[33]  P. N. Fox,et al.  Multi-environment testing and genotype × environment interaction , 1997 .

[34]  M. Liebman,et al.  Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems , 2000 .

[35]  N. Jordan.  Prospects for Weed Control Through Crop Interference. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[36]  D. A. Wall.  Comparison of Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) and Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Growth, Development, and Competitiveness under Three Temperature Regimes , 1993, Weed Science.

[37]  Maurizio Sattin,et al.  Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on the relative leaf area of weeds , 1996 .