Monitoring the abundance of mouflon in South France

Monitoring change in the population size of mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon × Ovis sp.) in rugged areas is an important yet difficult task for wildlife ecologists. To assess population change of mouflon inhabiting the Caroux-Espinouse massif, France, we compared a pedestrian and helicopter survey, using counts of animals as indices of abundance. Environmental factors such as date of survey and temperature affected the detection of mouflons from the ground and the air. Both indices were sensitive to observed changes in population size. A decrease in the pedestrian index was recorded in 1994, the year following an epizootic of keratoconjunctivitis, which markedly reduced the survival rate of mouflon. Variations in pedestrian index accounted for variations in harvests when excluding epizootic events. Both surveys detected a decrease in population size, which accounted for the recent increase of harvest. Helicopter and pedestrian surveys are reliable tools to monitor annually mouflons in mountainous areas. Simulations indicated that helicopter surveys should be preferred by managers because they provide the best trade-off between cost and precision.

[1]  A. Hewison,et al.  Seasonal use and selection of habitat by mouflon (Ovis gmelini):Comparison of the sexes , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats , 1980 .

[3]  B. Sæther,et al.  Biased adult sex ratio can affect fecundity in primiparous moose Alces alces , 2002, Wildlife Biology.

[4]  G. Seber,et al.  Estimating Animal Abundance: Review III , 1999 .

[5]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis , 2002 .

[6]  W. R. Gould,et al.  Comparison of helicopter and ground surveys for North American elk Cervus elaphus and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus population composition , 2003, Wildlife Biology.

[7]  J. Gerard,et al.  An example of segregation between age and sex classes only weakly related to habitat use in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) , 1998 .

[8]  R. Rausch,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Aerial Moose Censusing , 1974 .

[9]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A REMOVAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITIES FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS , 2002 .

[10]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[11]  C. McCulloch,et al.  New Approaches to the Analysis of Population Trends in Land Birds , 1997 .

[12]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Analysis of vertebrate populations , 1977 .

[13]  J. Gaillard,et al.  The effects of a severe drought on mouflon lamb survival , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  G. Seber.  The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[15]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations: Modeling, Estimation and Decision Making , 2002 .

[16]  William A. Link,et al.  ESTIMATION OF POPULATION TRAJECTORIES FROM COUNT DATA , 1997 .

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[18]  M. Festa‐Bianchet.  Exploitative Wildlife Management as a Selective Pressure for Life-History Evolution of Large Mammals , 2005 .

[19]  J. Nichols,et al.  A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE FROM POINT COUNTS , 2000 .

[20]  H. Kobryń,et al.  Two forms of domestic goats in Europe and Asia from the Neolithic Age to the Middle Ages , 1991 .

[21]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Patterns of mouflon (Ovis gmelini) survival under moderate environmental conditions: effects of sex, age, and epizootics , 1997 .

[22]  D. O. Logofet.  Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[23]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Genetic consequences of hunting: what do we know and what should we do? , 2002 .

[24]  Yanto Santosa.  Utilisation de parametres eco-ethologiques pour la mise au point d'une methode d'etude quantitative des populations de grands mammiferes : exemple du mouflon (ovis ammon musimon) du massif du caroux-espinouse , 1990 .

[25]  B. Sæther,et al.  Effects of Altering Sex Ratio Structure on the Demography of an Isolated Moose Population , 2003 .

[26]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores , 2000 .

[27]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Kilometric index as biological indicator for monitoring forest roe deer populations , 1991 .

[28]  P. Gibert,et al.  Le mouflon de Corse , 1991 .

[29]  L. L. Eberhardt,et al.  Calibrating Population Indices by Double Sampling , 1987 .

[30]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Wildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future Directions , 2000, Biometrics.

[31]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies , 2001 .

[32]  J. Eadie.  Animal Behavior and Wildlife Conservation , 2004 .

[33]  W. Boyce,et al.  Distribution and abundance of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges, California , 1998 .

[34]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations , 1994 .

[35]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals , 1996 .

[36]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances, with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data , 1981 .