Biomechanical analysis of double poling in elite cross-country skiers.

PURPOSE To further the understanding of double poling (DP) through biomechanical analysis of upper and lower body movements during DP in cross-country (XC) skiing at racing speed. METHODS Eleven elite XC skiers performed DP at 85% of their maximal DP velocity (V85%) during roller skiing at 1 degrees inclination on a treadmill. Pole and plantar ground reaction forces, joint angles (elbow, hip, knee, and ankle), cycle characteristics, and electromyography (EMG) of upper and lower body muscles were analyzed. RESULTS 1) Pole force pattern with initial impact force peak and the following active force peak (PPF) correlated to V85%, (r = 0.66, P < 0.05); 2) active flexion-extension pattern in elbow, hip, knee, and ankle joints with angle minima occurring around PPF, correlated to hip angle at pole plant (r = -0.89, P < 0.01), minimum elbow angle (r = -0.71), and relative poling time (r = -0.72, P < 0.05); 3) two different DP strategies (A and B), where strategy A (best skiers) was characterized by higher angular elbow- and hip-flexion velocities, smaller minimum elbow (P < 0.01) and hip angles (P < 0.05), and higher PPF (P < 0.05); 4) EMG activity in trunk and hip flexors, shoulder, and elbow extensors, and several lower body muscles followed a specific sequential pattern with changing activation levels; and 5) EMG activity in lower body muscles showed DP requires more than upper body work. CONCLUSIONS DP was found to be a complex movement involving both the upper and lower body showing different strategies concerning several biomechanical aspects. Future research should further investigate the relationship between biomechanical and physiological variables and elaborate training models to improve DP performance.

[1]  P. Clifford,et al.  Delta efficiency of uphill roller skiing with the double pole and diagonal stride techniques. , 1995, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[2]  Jan Helgerud,et al.  Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[3]  Per Tveit,et al.  Pole length and ground reaction forces during maximal double poling in skiing. , 2003, Sports biomechanics.

[4]  P. Clifford,et al.  Physiological comparison of uphill roller skiing: diagonal stride versus double pole. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  P. Clifford,et al.  Physiological aspects of competitive cross-country skiing. , 1992, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  Martin D. Hoffman,et al.  Effect of Velocity on Cycle Rate and Length for Three Roller Skiing Techniques , 1995 .

[7]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[8]  U. Wisløff,et al.  Methods for evaluating peak oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold in upper body of cross-country skiers. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  P. Clifford,et al.  Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of technique and speed. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  R. Hughson,et al.  The energy cost of cross-country skiing among elite competitors. , 1979, Medicine and science in sports.

[11]  M. M. Roberts,et al.  Physiological effects of technique and rolling resistance in uphill roller skiing. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  M. Boulay,et al.  Upper-body testing of cross-country skiers. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  H-C Holmberg,et al.  Leg and arm lactate and substrate kinetics during exercise. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[14]  P. Clifford,et al.  Lactate response to uphill roller skiing: diagonal stride versus double pole techniques. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Kenneth W. Rundell,et al.  Cross‐Country Ski Racing Performance Predicted by Aerobic and Anaerobic Double Poling Power , 2000 .

[16]  G. A. Smith,et al.  Double Poling Kinematics and Performance in Cross-Country Skiing , 1996 .

[17]  P. Clifford,et al.  Physiological responses to different cross country skiing techniques on level terrain. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  J. Helgerud,et al.  Maximal strength training improves aerobic endurance performance , 2002, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[19]  Per Tveit,et al.  Effects of 20-s and 180-s double poling interval training in cross-country skiers , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[20]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[21]  F. Saibene,et al.  The energy cost of level cross-country skiing and the effect of the friction of the ski , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[22]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[23]  U. Wisløff,et al.  Maximal strength training improves work economy in trained female cross-country skiers. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  P. Clifford,et al.  Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of grade. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  S. Gaskill,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF UPPER BODY POWER IN JUNIOR CROSS‐COUNTRY SKIERS , 1999, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[26]  T Bober,et al.  Study of eccentric-concentric contraction of the upper extremity muscles. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  G M Jones,et al.  Effects of technique and pole grip on physiological demands of roller skiing on level terrain. , 1991, International journal of sports medicine.

[28]  B. Larsson,et al.  Evaluation of a specific test in cross-country skiing. , 1991, Journal of sports sciences.