Decision making styles and the use of heuristics in decision making

Simple heuristics can be efficient ways of decision making and literature has shown that they are widely used in actual decision situations. Although many types of heuristics have been found and analyzed, there is only scarce research on factors that lead to the use of a particular heuristic. In the present paper, we describe an experiment to analyze whether the usage of a particular heuristic like recognition or take-the-best depends on individual decision making styles as identified by Scott and Bruce (Educ Psychol Meas 55(5):818–831, 1995). The experiment is based on a choice problem, in which different heuristics are likely to lead to different choices. Analyzing experimental data from two replications of the experiment in two different countries, we find some evidence that decision making styles influence the use of heuristics. However, considerable differences between the two experiments indicate that other, perhaps cultural, factors might also be important.

[1]  Reginald A. Bruce,et al.  Decision-Making Style: The Development and Assessment of a New Measure , 1995 .

[2]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[3]  Russell N. Laczniak,et al.  Advertising's Influence on Subsequent Product Trial Processing , 2001 .

[4]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[5]  G. Gigerenzer.  Decision Making: Nonrational Theories , 2001 .

[6]  B. Hilbig,et al.  A matter of time: antecedents of one-reason decision making based on recognition. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[7]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Consideration-set heuristics ☆ , 2014 .

[8]  George B. Sproles,et al.  A methodology for profiling consumers' decision-making styles , 1986 .

[9]  U. Hoffrage,et al.  Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison , 2002 .

[10]  Benjamin E Hilbig,et al.  Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[11]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Stimulus format and working memory in fast and frugal strategy selection , 2006 .

[12]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  The recognition heuristic in memory‐based inference: is recognition a non‐compensatory cue? , 2008 .

[13]  S. Ayal,et al.  Ignorance or integration: the cognitive processes underlying choice behavior , 2009 .

[14]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[16]  Rüdiger F. Pohl,et al.  Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic , 2006 .

[17]  A. Bröder.  Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  B. Hilbig.  Individual differences in fast-and-frugal decision making : neuroticism and the recognition heuristic , 2008 .

[19]  Volker Thoma,et al.  The devil you know: The effect of brand recognition and product ratings on consumer choice , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  "Take-the-best" and other simple strategies: Why and when they work "well" with binary cues , 2006 .

[21]  P. Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, European Journal of Operational Research.

[22]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  Models of bounded rationality : The approach of fast and frugal heuristics , 2004 .

[23]  M. Greenacre.  Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .

[24]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentiality of further knowledge: two critical tests of the recognition heuristic , 2006 .

[25]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Relation of job search and choice process with subsequent satisfaction , 2005 .

[27]  P. Gaspar,et al.  Functional and organic eggs as an alternative to conventional production: a conjoint analysis of consumers' preferences. , 2011, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[28]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Criterion knowledge: A moderator of using the recognition heuristic? , 2009 .

[29]  Elmar Kiesling,et al.  A comparison of representations for discrete multi-criteria decision problems , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  A. Bröder.  Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Sandra Schruijer,et al.  Decision Styles and Rationality , 2012 .

[32]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: A decade of research , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[33]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognition-based models for multialternative inference , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[35]  T. Langner,et al.  The mere categorization effect for complex products: The moderating role of expertise and affect☆ , 2013 .

[36]  J. Hauser,et al.  A marketing science perspective on recognition-based heuristics (and the fast-and-frugal paradigm) , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[37]  B. Newell,et al.  Empirical tests of a fast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone "takes-the-best" , 2003 .

[38]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[39]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  On the role of recognition in consumer choice: A model comparison , 2014, Judgment and Decision Making.

[40]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.