Confiabilidade inter e intra-examinador da fotopodometria e intra-examinador da fotopodoscopia

Inter and Intra-Examiner Reliability of Photopodometry and Intra-Examiner Reliability of Photopodoscopy Objective: To evaluate the inter and intra-examiner reliability of photopodometry and the intra-examiner reliability of photopodoscopy. Method: Plantar prints from 30 healthy individuals of both sexes with mean age of 21.0 ± 1.32 years were photographed. These individuals were positioned on a podoscope with bare feet, bipedal support and orthostatic posture. The plantar print images reflected on the glass of this instrument were captured using a 2.1 megapixel digital photographic camera positioned on a tripod in front of the podoscope. The images were filed and subsequently subjected to inter and intra-examiner analysis. To verify the intra-examiner reliability of photopodoscopy, the whole procedure of podogram capture and analysis was repeated on the same individuals four weeks later. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the inter and intra-examiner analyses on the photopodometry were, respectively, 0.96 and 0.98. The ICC for the intra-examiner reliability of the photopodometry was 0.94. Conclusion: Photopodometry is a reliable quantitative analysis method and photopodoscopy is an evaluation method applicable to clinical and scientific analyses. They therefore make it possible to follow up the evolution of physiotherapeutic treatment on plantar supports, despite the intrinsic and extrinsic variability between individuals.

[1]  J. Cobey,et al.  Standardizing Methods of Measurement of Foot Shape by Including the Effects of Subtalar Rotation , 1981, Foot & ankle.

[2]  G. K. Rose,et al.  The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Footprint Parameters as a Measure of Arch Height , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[5]  J. B. Volpon O pé em crescimento, segundo as impressões plantares * , 1993 .

[6]  E. Fess Guidelines for evaluating assessment instruments. , 1995, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[7]  D. Upton,et al.  Comparison of footprint parameters calculated from static and dynamic footprints , 1999 .

[8]  U. Kanatlı,et al.  Footprint and Radiographic Analysis of the Feet , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[9]  Mohsen Razeghi,et al.  Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[10]  H. J. C. G. Coury,et al.  ANÁLISE DA CONFIABILIDADE DE TÉCNICAS FOTOMÉTRICAS PARA MEDIR A FLEXÃO ANTERIOR DO TRONCO , 2003 .

[11]  S. Willner,et al.  The role of moiré photography in evaluating minor scoliotic curves , 1982, International Orthopaedics.

[12]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.