Stroke Survivors' Gait Adaptations to a Powered Ankle–Foot Orthosis

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the US, and for many it causes loss of gait function. The purpose of this research is to examine stroke survivors' gait adaptations to training on the powered ankle–foot orthosis (PAFO). Of particular interest is the stroke survivors' ability to learn how to store and release energy properly while using the device. The PAFO utilizes robotic tendon technology and supports motion with a single degree of freedom — ankle rotation in the sagittal plane. This actuator comprises a motor and series spring. The user interacts with the output side of the spring while the robot controls the input side of the spring such that typical able-body ankle moments would be generated, assuming able-body ankle kinematics are seen at the output side of the spring. Three individuals post-stroke participated in a 3-week training protocol. Outcome measures (temporal, kinematic and kinetic) were derived from robot sensors and recorded for every step. These data are used to evaluate each stroke survivor's adaptations to robotic gait assistance. The robot was worn only on the paretic ankle. For validation of the kinematic results, motion capture data were collected on the third subject. All subjects showed increased cadence, ankle range of motion and power generation capabilities. Additionally, all subjects were able to achieve a larger power output than power input from the robot. Motion capture data collected from Subject 3 validated the robot sensor kinematic data on the affected side, but also demonstrated an unexpected gait adaptation on the unaffected ankle. Sensors on the gait-assisting robot provide large volumes of valuable information on how gait parameters change over time. We have developed key gait evaluation metrics based on the available robot sensor information that may be useful to future researchers. All subjects adapted their gait to the robotic assistance and many of their key metrics moved closer to typical able-body values. This suggests that each subject learned to utilize the assistive moments generated by the robot, despite having no predefined ankle trajectory input from the robot. The security of being harnessed on the treadmill led to more dramatic and favorable results.

[1]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[2]  Thomas Sugar,et al.  Dynamically Controlled Ankle-Foot Orthosis (DCO) with Regenerative Kinetics: Incrementally Attaining User Portability , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Ward,et al.  Control Architectures for a Powered Ankle Foot Orthsosis , 2008 .

[6]  Robert Ilg,et al.  An efficient robotic tendon for gait assistance. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  D. Makuc,et al.  Health, United States, 2003; with chartbook on trends in the health of Americans , 2003 .

[8]  Judith E. Deutsch,et al.  Post-Stroke Rehabilitation with the Rutgers Ankle System: A Case Study , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  T. Olsen,et al.  Prediction of walking function in stroke patients with initial lower extremity paralysis: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotic movement training as an optimization problem: designing a controller that assists only as needed , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[11]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Novel Robot for Ankle Rehabilitation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[13]  Jack R Engsberg,et al.  Methods to Locate Center of Gravity in Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[14]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Jeffrey A. Ward,et al.  Dynamic Pace Controller for the Robotic Gait Trainer , 2006 .

[16]  Nancy R Cook,et al.  Body mass index and the risk of stroke in men. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Learning to walk with a robotic ankle exoskeleton. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R. Riener,et al.  Hybrid force-position control yields cooperative behaviour of the rehabilitation robot LOKOMAT , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[19]  A. Mirelman,et al.  Effects of Training With a Robot-Virtual Reality System Compared With a Robot Alone on the Gait of Individuals After Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[20]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[21]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[22]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[23]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Biomedical Assist Devices and New Biomimetic Machines—A Short Perspective , 2005 .

[24]  R. Bernhardt,et al.  Synthesis of perturbations for gait rehabilitation robots , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[25]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Ankle Training With a Robotic Device Improves Hemiparetic Gait After a Stroke , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Design of a two degree-of-freedom ankle-foot orthosis for robotic rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[28]  E Taub,et al.  New discovery equals change in clinical practice. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.