Evidence of Perspective-Taking Constraints in Children's On-Line Reference Resolution

Young children's communication has often been characterized as egocentric. Some researchers claim that the processing of language involves an initial stage that relies on egocentric heuristics, even in adults. Such an account, combined with general developmental difficulties with late-stage processes, could provide an explanation for much of children's egocentric communication. However, the experimental data reported in this article do not support such an account: In an elicited-production task, 5- to 6-year-old children were found to be sensitive to their partner's perspective. Moreover, in an on-line comprehension task, they showed sensitivity to common-ground information from the initial stages of language processing. We propose that mutual knowledge is not distinct from other knowledge relevant for language processing, and exerts early effects on processing in proportion to its salience and reliability.

[1]  J. Piaget.  The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[2]  J. Piaget.  The moral judgement in the child, New York (Harcourt, Brace & Company) 1932. , 1932 .

[3]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Review of Child Development Research , 1966 .

[4]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[5]  J. Flavell,et al.  The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. , 1974, Child development.

[6]  Carole L. Menig-Peterson.  The Modification of Communicative Behavior in Preschool-aged Children as a Function of the Listener's Perspective. , 1975 .

[7]  David Warden,et al.  The Influence of Context on Children's Use of Identifying Expressions and References. , 1976 .

[8]  M. Maratsos.  The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children: An Experimental Study of Semantic Acquisition , 1976 .

[9]  Barry M. Kroll.  Adapting a Composition to the Audience: The Development of Referential Communication Skills. , 1979 .

[10]  B. Ackerman,et al.  Performative bias in children's interpretations of ambiguous referential communications. , 1981, Child development.

[11]  T. Pechmann,et al.  Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions , 1982, Cognition.

[12]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[13]  Developing Referential Communication: A Hierarchy of Skills. , 1984 .

[14]  Josef Perner,et al.  Belief and quantity: three-year olds' adaptation to listener's knowledge , 1986, Journal of Child Language.

[15]  R. Power,et al.  The use of the definite and indefinite articles by Italian preschool children , 1986, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  E. Lynch,et al.  The role of social cognition in comprehension monitoring , 1988 .

[17]  B. Ackerman,et al.  Children's Use of the Common Ground in Interpreting Ambiguous Referential Utterances. , 1990 .

[18]  Laura E. Berk,et al.  Private Speech : From Social Interaction To Self-regulation , 1992 .

[19]  M. Boyes.  Internalization of Social Discourse: A Vygotskian Account of the Development of Young Children's Theories of Mind. , 1993 .

[20]  Chris Moore,et al.  Children's theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding. , 1993 .

[21]  H. H. Clark.  Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[22]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[23]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  Daniela K. O'Neill,et al.  Two‐Year‐Old Children's Sensitivity to a Parent's Knowledge State When Making Requests , 1996 .

[25]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[26]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' reliance on a social criterion for establishing word-object relations. , 1996, Child development.

[27]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Role of Discourse Novelty in Early Word Learning , 1996 .

[28]  D. Barr,et al.  The Egocentric Basis of Language Use , 1998 .

[29]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[31]  Timothy S. Paek,et al.  Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension , 1998 .

[32]  T. Charman,et al.  The relationship between theory of mind, language, and narrative discourse : an experimental study , 1998 .

[33]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[34]  John P. Pinto,et al.  Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months , 1999, Cognition.

[35]  P. Bloom.  How children learn the meanings of words , 2000 .

[36]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[37]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[38]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Gender and Spoken-Word Recognition in French , 2000 .

[39]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Circumscribing Referential Domains during Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[40]  Brian D. Cox,et al.  Sociogenetic perspectives on internalization , 2013 .