Numerical study of large amplitude, nonsinusoidal motion and camber effects on pitching airfoil propulsion

Abstract The effects of large amplitude and nonsinusoidal motion on pitching airfoil aerodynamics for thrust generation were numerically studied with a 2-D NACA0012 airfoil used, and various 2-D NACA asymmetric airfoils were applied for camber effect study. The large amplitude effect study has been undertaken over a wide range of reduced frequency k (from 6 to 18) and pitching amplitude θ (from 5° to 30°) at Re=1.35×104 with sinusoidal pitching profile used. It is shown that the large pitching amplitude results in much more thrust generated than that at low pitching amplitude and the increase of thrust with amplitude becomes slow when the amplitude reaches some degree. However, the propulsive efficiency noticeably decreases with the increase of θ at a fixed k. An adjustable parameter K was employed to realize various nonsinusoidal motions and the effect of nonsinusoidal motion was investigated with various unsteady parameters (θ, k) applied. The results reveal that nonsinusoidal motion has a noticeable effect on the aerodynamic performance, as it affects the instantaneous force coefficients, maximum thrust coefficients and flow structures. An increase in K results in a better thrust generation performance at fixed θ and k, especially for K>0. It is also shown that the larger K noticeably influences the wake pattern and induces a stronger reverse von Karman vortex street in the wake, which in turn leads to the increased thrust. The camber study was performed on various 2-D NACA airfoils with different cambers and camber locations undergoing sinusoidal pitching motion at θ=5° and Re=1.35×104. It is found that varying camber offers little improvement in thrust generation performance.

[1]  F. Liu,et al.  Subsonic Flow over Unstalled Pitching Airfoil Computed by Euler Method , 2006 .

[2]  H. Haj-Hariri,et al.  Modelling thrust generation of a two-dimensional heaving airfoil in a viscous flow , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Joseph C. S. Lai,et al.  Mechanisms Influencing the Efficiency of Oscillating Airfoil Propulsion , 2007 .

[4]  R. Ramamurti,et al.  Simulation of Flow About Flapping Airfoils Using Finite Element Incompressible Flow Solver , 2001 .

[5]  Joseph C. S. Lai,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Flapping Wing Aerodynamics , 2007 .

[6]  C. Rhie,et al.  Numerical Study of the Turbulent Flow Past an Airfoil with Trailing Edge Separation , 1983 .

[7]  Hui Hu,et al.  A Numerical Study of Vortex-Dominated Flow around an Oscillating Airfoil with High-Order Spectral Difference Method , 2010 .

[8]  Hui Hu,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Asymmetric Wake Vortex Structures around an Oscillating Airfoil , 2012 .

[9]  I. E. Garrick Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil , 1936 .

[10]  Chunlei Liang,et al.  High-order accurate simulations of unsteady flow past plunging and pitching airfoils , 2011 .

[11]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  A computational study on the dynamic stall of a flapping airfoil , 1998 .

[12]  Joseph C. S. Lai,et al.  Vortex lock-in phenomenon in the wake of a plunging airfoil , 2007 .

[13]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering , 2003 .

[15]  John Young,et al.  Oscillation Frequency and Amplitude Effects on the Wake of a Plunging Airfoil , 2004 .

[16]  Wei Liao,et al.  Numerical study of asymmetric effect on a pitching foil , 2009 .

[17]  C. M. Dohring,et al.  Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Knoller-Betz Effect , 1998 .

[18]  M. Koochesfahani Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil , 1987 .

[19]  Sunetra Sarkar,et al.  Numerical simulation of thrust generating flow past a pitching airfoil , 2006 .

[20]  F. Bos,et al.  Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  K. Isogai,et al.  Effects of Dynamic Stall on Propulsive Efficiency and Thrust of Flapping Airfoil , 1999 .

[22]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Nonsinusoidal Path Optimization of a Flapping Airfoil , 2007 .

[23]  Joseph C. S. Lai,et al.  Reynolds number, thickness and camber effects on flapping airfoil propulsion , 2011 .

[24]  John Young,et al.  Flapping Wing Aerodynamics: Progress and Challenges , 2008 .

[25]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Thrust Generation due to Airfoil Flapping , 1996 .

[26]  Sam Heathcote,et al.  Effect of Spanwise Flexibility on Flapping Wing Propulsion , 2006 .

[27]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion , 2004 .

[28]  Shengyi Wang,et al.  Numerical investigations on dynamic stall of low Reynolds number flow around oscillating airfoils , 2010 .

[29]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Optimal Thrust Development in Oscillating Foils with Application to Fish Propulsion , 1993 .

[30]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Performance of flapping foil propulsion , 2005 .

[31]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Numerical Computation of Flapping-Wing Propulsion and Power Extraction , 1997 .