Micro-costing diagnostics in oncology: from single-gene testing to whole- genome sequencing

Predictive diagnostics play an increasingly important role in personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) based treatment selection is expected to rapidly increase worldwide. Detailed and comparative cost analyses of diagnostic techniques are an essential element in decision-making. This study aimed to calculate and compare the total cost of currently used diagnostic techniques and of WGS in treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the Netherlands.The activity-based costing (ABC) method was conducted to calculate the total cost of included diagnostic techniques based on data provided by Dutch pathology laboratories and the Dutch centralized cancer WGS facility. Costs were allocated to four categories: capital costs, maintenance costs, software costs and operational costs. Outcome measures were total cost per cancer patient per included technique, and the total cost per cancer patient per most commonly applied technique (combination) for each cancer type.The total cost per cancer patient per technique varied from € 58 (Sanger sequencing, 3 amplicons) to € 4738 (paired tumor-normal WGS). The operational costs accounted for the vast majority over 90 % of the total per cancer patient technique costs. The most important operational cost drivers were consumables followed by personnel (for sample preparation and primary data analysis).This study outlined in detail all costing aspects and cost prices of current and new diagnostic modalities used in treatment of NSCLC, melanoma, CRC and GIST in the Netherlands. Detailed cost differences and value comparisons between these diagnostic techniques enable future economic evaluations to support decision-making on implementation of WGS and other diagnostic modalities in routine clinical practice.

[1]  A. Pagnamenta,et al.  The complete costs of genome sequencing: a microcosting study in cancer and rare diseases from a single center in the United Kingdom , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  J. Subramanian,et al.  Performance of next-generation sequencing on small tumor specimens and/or low tumor content samples using a commercially available platform , 2018, PloS one.

[3]  H. Nakagawa,et al.  Whole genome sequencing analysis for cancer genomics and precision medicine , 2018, Cancer science.

[4]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Molecular testing for BRAF mutations to inform melanoma treatment decisions: a move toward precision medicine , 2017, Modern Pathology.

[5]  R. Scott,et al.  The rise of the genome and personalised medicine , 2017, Clinical medicine (London).

[6]  C. L. Cowey,et al.  Challenging the standard of care in advanced melanoma: focus on pembrolizumab , 2017, Cancer management and research.

[7]  L. Sholl Molecular diagnostics of lung cancer in the clinic. , 2017, Translational lung cancer research.

[8]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  Tissue recommendations for precision cancer therapy using next generation sequencing: a comprehensive single cancer center’s experiences , 2017, Oncotarget.

[9]  M. Heinrich,et al.  Using molecular diagnostic testing to personalize the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors , 2017, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[10]  Lionel Perrier,et al.  Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice: a nationwide French study , 2018, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[11]  M. Plöthner,et al.  Cost analysis of whole genome sequencing in German clinical practice , 2017, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[12]  Gert Jan van der Wilt,et al.  Is the $1000 Genome as Near as We Think? A Cost Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  W. V. van Harten,et al.  Next-generation sequencing in NSCLC and melanoma patients: a cost and budget impact analysis , 2016, Ecancermedicalscience.

[14]  F. Sinicrope,et al.  Molecular Biomarkers in the Personalized Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. , 2016, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[15]  Shivang Doshi,et al.  Genomic Sequencing Procedure Microcosting Analysis and Health Economic Cost-Impact Analysis , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[16]  K. Kruglyak,et al.  Next-Generation Sequencing and Applications to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[17]  C. Rudin,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Chester,et al.  Personalised cancer medicine , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[19]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  H. Groen,et al.  Common and Rare EGFR and KRAS Mutations in a Dutch Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Population and Their Clinical Outcome , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  M. Ligtenberg,et al.  EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung carcinomas in the Dutch population: increased EGFR mutation frequency in malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma , 2012, Cellular Oncology.

[22]  George M Yousef,et al.  Personalized Medicine: Marking a New Epoch in Cancer Patient Management , 2010, Molecular Cancer Research.

[23]  M. Casparie,et al.  Pathology Databanking and Biobanking in The Netherlands, a Central Role for PALGA, the Nationwide Histopathology and Cytopathology Data Network and Archive , 2007, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[24]  Yolande Lievens,et al.  Activity-based costing: a practical model for cost calculation in radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.