Optimal Image Sample Size for Corneal Nerve Morphometry

Purpose. Arbitrary numbers of corneal confocal microscopy images have been used for analysis of corneal subbasal nerve parameters under the implicit assumption that these are a representative sample of the central corneal nerve plexus. The purpose of this study is to present a technique for quantifying the number of random central corneal images required to achieve an acceptable level of accuracy in the measurement of corneal nerve fiber length and branch density. Methods. Every possible combination of 2 to 16 images (where 16 was deemed the true mean) of the central corneal subbasal nerve plexus, not overlapping by more than 20%, were assessed for nerve fiber length and branch density in 20 subjects with type 2 diabetes and varying degrees of functional nerve deficit. Mean ratios were calculated to allow comparisons between and within subjects. Results. In assessing nerve branch density, eight randomly chosen images not overlapping by more than 20% produced an average that was within 30% of the true mean 95% of the time. A similar sampling strategy of five images was 13% within the true mean 80% of the time for corneal nerve fiber length. Conclusions. The “sample combination analysis” presented here can be used to determine the sample size required for a desired level of accuracy of quantification of corneal subbasal nerve parameters. This technique may have applications in other biological sampling studies.

[1]  B. Masters,et al.  Confocal microscopy of the human cornea in vivo , 2004, International Ophthalmology.

[2]  P. Good,et al.  Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses , 1995 .

[3]  P. Sönksen,et al.  A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic population , 1993, Diabetologia.

[4]  R. A. Malik,et al.  Corneal confocal microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients , 2003, Diabetologia.

[5]  Edoardo Midena,et al.  Corneal diabetic neuropathy: a confocal microscopy study. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  D. Patel,et al.  Corneal Sensitivity and Slit Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Subbasal Nerve Plexus of the Normal Central and Peripheral Human Cornea , 2009, Cornea.

[7]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[8]  Abdul Shakoor,et al.  Variability of unconfined compressive strength in relation to number of test samples , 2009 .

[9]  M. Coroneo,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  M. A. Dabbah,et al.  Dual-Model Automatic Detection of Nerve-Fibres in Corneal Confocal Microscopy Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[11]  C. McGhee,et al.  Atypical unilateral superior keratoconus in young males. , 2005, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[12]  N. Pritchard,et al.  Corneal markers of diabetic neuropathy. , 2011, The ocular surface.

[13]  N. Efron Contact lens-induced changes in the anterior eye as observed in vivo with the confocal microscope , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[14]  E. Ziegel Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[15]  Dipika V Patel,et al.  Mapping of the normal human corneal sub-Basal nerve plexus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Nathan Efron,et al.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[17]  N. Efron,et al.  Subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after LASIK and LASEK assessed by noncontact esthesiometry and in vivo confocal microscopy: Prospective study , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  J. Graham,et al.  Repeatability of Measuring Corneal Subbasal Nerve Fiber Length in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes , 2010, Eye & contact lens.

[19]  Oliver Stachs,et al.  In vivo three-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy of the epithelial nerve structure in the human cornea , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.