Attention to social comparison information and brand avoidance behaviors

This research links brand avoidance behaviors to attention to social comparison information (ATSCI). We posit that high (vs low) ATSCI consumers will suffer from more social-evaluative uncertainty, i.e., more uncertainty regarding others’ reactions to their brand choices. To alleviate this problem, high ATSCI consumers will avoid distinctive or conspicuous brands and brand icons that might draw the attention of others, playing safe in their brand choices, rather than risking social disapproval. Two preliminary studies provide support for the theoretical assumptions, confirming that ATSCI is positively associated with brand consciousness, brand social-evaluative uncertainty, and brand avoidance motivated by social-evaluative concerns. Study 1 examines brand identification and shows that although high and low ATSCI consumers identify themselves with equally prestigious brands, the former avoid identifying with distinctive brands. Study 2 demonstrates that unlike their low ATSCI counterparts, high ATSCI consumers avoid conspicuous brand logos even in the case of highly prestigious brands.

[1]  David Gal,et al.  Competing for Consumer Identity: Limits to Self-Expression and the Perils of Lifestyle Branding , 2011 .

[2]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice , 2012 .

[3]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[5]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands , 2003 .

[6]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence , 2010 .

[7]  エレン グッドマン 自分が望む死に方を選ぼう (HBR Articles 世界の課題を解決する HBR 13の提言) , 2012 .

[8]  K. Rudolph,et al.  The socioemotional costs and benefits of social-evaluative concerns: do girls care too much? , 2005, Journal of personality.

[9]  B. Calder,et al.  Interpersonal Influence on Consumer Behavior: An Attribution Theory Approach , 1977 .

[10]  A. Muñiz,et al.  How Brand Community Practices Create Value , 2009 .

[11]  William O. Bearden,et al.  Attention to Social Comparison Information: An Individual Difference Factor Affecting Consumer Conformity , 1990 .

[12]  Kelly Tepper Tian,et al.  Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation , 2001 .

[13]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies , 2003 .

[14]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues , 2008 .

[15]  E. Higgins Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[16]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[17]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence , 2007 .

[18]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[19]  D. Berlyne Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[20]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  Self‐Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning , 2005 .

[22]  S. Levy Symbols for Sale , 1999 .

[23]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[24]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives: Examining the Role of Brand-Cause Fit in Cause-Related Marketing , 2007 .

[25]  Jonah Berger,et al.  When Identity Marketing Backfires: Consumer Agency in Identity Expression , 2014 .

[26]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  Drivers of consumer–brand identification , 2012 .

[27]  B. Buunk,et al.  Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  S. Posavac,et al.  How Naive Theories Drive Opposing Inferences from the Same Information , 2013 .

[29]  Americus Reed,et al.  Playing It Safe: Susceptibility to Normative Influence and Protective Self‐Presentation , 2004 .

[30]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .

[31]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption , 2008 .

[32]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences , 2006 .