Task versus Subtask Surgical Skill Evaluation of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery

Evaluating surgical skill is a time consuming, subjective, and difficult process. This paper compares two methods of identifying the skill level of a subject given motion data from a benchtop surgical task. In the first method, we build discrete Hidden Markov Models at the task level, and test against these models. In the second method, we build discrete Hidden Markov Models of surgical gestures, called surgemes, and evaluate skill at this level. We apply these techniques to 57 data sets collected from the da Vinci surgical system. Our current techniques have achieved accuracy levels of 100% using task level models and known gesture segmentation, 95% with task level models and unknown gesture segmentation, and 100% with the surgeme level models in correctly identifying the skill level. We observe that, although less accurate, the second method requires less prior label information. Also, the surgeme level classification provided more insights into what subjects did well, and what they did poorly.

[1]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[2]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Hidden Markov Model Analysis of Force/ Torque Information in Telemanipulation , 1989, ISER.

[3]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[4]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Hidden Markov model approach to skill learning and its application to telerobotics , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Geir Hovland,et al.  Skill acquisition from human demonstration using a hidden Markov model , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  Task and Motion Analyses in Endoscopic Surgery , 1996, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[7]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Intuitive/sup TM/ telesurgery system: overview and application , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[8]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Automatic Motion Recognition and Skill Evaluation for Dynamic Tasks , 2003 .

[9]  A. Darzi,et al.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  Rajiv V. Dubey,et al.  Robotic therapy for persons with disabilities using Hidden Markov Model based skill learning , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Modelling and Evaluation of Surgical Performance Using Hidden Markov Models , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Henry C. Lin,et al.  Towards automatic skill evaluation: Detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[13]  H. Xina,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery , perceptual limitations and force : A review , 2006 .

[14]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Generalized approach for modeling minimally invasive surgery as a stochastic process using a discrete Markov model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.