On the accuracy of urban crowd-sourcing for maintaining large-scale geospatial databases

The world is in the midst of an immense population shift from rural areas to cities. Urban elements, such as businesses, Points-of-Interest (POIs), transportation, and housing are continuously changing, and collecting and maintaining accurate information about these elements within spatial databases has become an incredibly onerous task. A solution made possible by the uptake of social media is crowd-sourcing, where user-generated content can be cultivated into meaningful and informative collections, as exemplified by sites like Wikipedia. This form of user-contributed content is no longer confined to the Web: equipped with powerful mobile devices, citizens have become cartographers too, volunteering geographic information (e.g., POIs) as exemplified by sites like OpenStreetMap. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which crowd-sourcing can be relied upon to build and maintain an accurate map of the changing world, by means of a thorough analysis and comparison between traditional web-based crowd-sourcing (as in Wikipedia) and urban crowd-sourcing (as in OpenStreetMap).

[1]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Cooperation and quality in wikipedia , 2007, WikiSym '07.

[2]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[3]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Learning to Predict the Quality of Contributions to Wikipedia , 2008 .

[4]  Thomas Chesney,et al.  An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility , 2006, First Monday.

[5]  Dirk Riehle How and why Wikipedia works: an interview with Angela Beesley, Elisabeth Bauer, and Kizu Naoko , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[6]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[7]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia , 2007, WWW '07.

[8]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia , 2007, First Monday.

[9]  Angi Voß,et al.  A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany , 2011, AGILE Conf..

[10]  Les Gasser,et al.  Information quality work organization in wikipedia , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus’ Law to Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010 .

[12]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Finding social roles in Wikipedia , 2011, iConference.

[13]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Lurking? cyclopaths?: a quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki , 2010, CHI.

[14]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation , 2007, CIKM '07.

[15]  P. Ingwersen,et al.  Proceedings of ISSI 2005 – The 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics: Stockholm, Sweden, July 24-28, 2005 , 2005 .

[16]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia , 2009, GROUP.

[17]  Felipe Ortega,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Wikipedia Community of Users , 2007 .

[18]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  A jury of your peers: quality, experience and ownership in Wikipedia , 2009, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[19]  John Riedl,et al.  Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia , 2007, GROUP.

[20]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  A unified theory of urban living , 2010, Nature.

[21]  J. Voß Measuring Wikipedia , 2005 .

[22]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[23]  A. Zipf,et al.  A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany , 2010 .

[24]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Quantitative analysis of thewikipedia community of users , 2007, WikiSym '07.

[25]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[26]  Guillaume Touya,et al.  Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset , 2010, Trans. GIS.