Urban Regeneration, Governance and the State: Exploring Notions of Distance and Proximity

Recent debates over how to characterise the governance of urban regeneration are developed in this paper using a detailed case study of Attwood Green in Birmingham, UK. Specifically, the relationship between actors within governance networks and the state is critically reappraised. The case study suggests that actors tend to display highly reflexive understandings of government as multifaceted and multidimensional, simultaneously trying to establish distance and proximity from different aspects of state power. The relationship between those agents regenerating Attwood Green and local and central government is highly strategic, manipulating transfers of financial, political and legal power through new organisational configurations.

[1]  K. Ward.  Rereading Urban Regime Theory: A Sympathetic Critique , 1996 .

[2]  Allan Cochrane,et al.  Whatever happened to local government , 1993 .

[3]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[4]  D. Canter,et al.  The Research interview, uses and approaches , 1986 .

[5]  R. Rogers,et al.  Towards an Urban Renaissance , 1999 .

[6]  J. Davies,et al.  Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK , 2002 .

[7]  Mike Beazley,et al.  Progrssive Regrimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[8]  Vivien Lowndes,et al.  Rescuing Aunt Sally: Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics , 2001 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[10]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[11]  Chris Couch,et al.  Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain , 2000 .

[12]  Ricardo R. Pinto,et al.  Central/local interaction in renovating run‐down estates — the view of housing authorities on the estate action initiative , 1991 .

[13]  J. Feagin,et al.  Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. , 1990 .

[14]  James W. Evans,et al.  Lost in Translation? Exploring the Interface between Local Environmental Research and Policymaking , 2006 .

[15]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  INNOVATION IN A REGULATED SERVICE: The case of English housing associations , 2001 .

[16]  Michael Ball,et al.  Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives , 2003 .

[17]  Stephen V. Ward,et al.  Planning and Urban Change , 1994 .

[18]  M. Warrington,et al.  Welfare Pluralism or Shadow State? The Provision of Social Housing in the 1990s , 1995 .

[19]  Peter Malpass,et al.  Policy Making and Local Governance: how Bristol Failed to Secure City Challenge Funding (Twice) , 1994 .

[20]  Kevin Thomas,et al.  Voluntary organizations and the reconfiguration of local governance , 1996 .

[21]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[22]  Jouni Paavola,et al.  Governance for Sustainability: Towards a ‘Thick’ Analysis of Environmental Decisionmaking , 2003 .

[23]  Phil Jones.  Historical continuity and post‐1945 urban redevelopment: the example of Lee Bank, Birmingham, UK , 2004 .

[24]  B. Jessop.  Institutional Re(turns) and the Strategic – Relational Approach , 2001 .

[25]  C de Magalhaes,et al.  Assessing Institutional Capacity for City Centre Regeneration: Newcastle's Grainger Town , 2002 .

[26]  Frank Moulaert,et al.  The Economic Organization of Cities: An Institutional Perspective , 1996 .

[27]  J. Davies,et al.  Conjuncture or Disjuncture? An Institutionalist Analysis of Local Regeneration Partnerships in the UK , 2004 .

[28]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding governance : policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability , 1997 .

[29]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Introduction: The Unintended Costs and Benefits of New Management Reform for British Local Government , 1999 .

[30]  James Philip Martin Evans.  Biodiversity conservation and brownfield sites : a scalar political ecology? , 2003 .

[31]  B. Jessop.  Post‐Fordism and the State , 1996 .

[32]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy , 2002 .

[33]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  The New Politics of British Local Governance , 2000 .

[34]  V. De Martinis,et al.  The Sustainable City: Urban Regeneration and Sustainability , 2000 .

[35]  Stephen L. Elkin.  City and regime in the American republic , 1988 .

[36]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Letting Managers Manage: Decentralisation and Opting Out , 1999 .

[37]  Rob Imrie,et al.  How New is the New Local Governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[38]  Norman Hutchison,et al.  The urban task force report: Reviewing land ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment , 2000 .

[39]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Incorporating sustainable development concerns into an urban regeneration project: how politics can defeat procedures , 2003 .

[40]  Alan Murie,et al.  Housing Policy and Practice , 1982 .

[41]  Jennifer Wolch,et al.  The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition , 1990 .

[42]  Steven Rathgeb Smith,et al.  The shadow state: Government and the voluntary sector in transition , 1992 .

[43]  Rob Krueger,et al.  Sustainability schizophrenia or “actually existing sustainabilities?” toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US , 2005 .

[44]  J. Davies,et al.  Partnerships versus Regimes: Why Regime Theory Cannot Explain Urban Coalitions in the Uk , 2003 .

[45]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[46]  Stephen Hall,et al.  The way forward for regeneration?: Lessons from the single regeneration budget challenge fund , 2000 .

[47]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[48]  Rebecca Fearnley.  Regenerating the Inner City: Lessons from the UK’s City Challenge Experience , 2000 .

[49]  Bjorn Malbert.  Participatory Approaches Sustainable Urban Development: Reflections on Practice Vancouver and Waitakere to in Seattle, , 1998 .

[50]  Andy Thornley,et al.  Urban Planning Under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market , 1991 .

[51]  J. Davies,et al.  The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis , 2002 .

[52]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  The new management of British local governance , 1999 .

[53]  John Pierson,et al.  Rebuilding Community: Policy and Practice in Urban Regeneration , 2001 .

[54]  Janet Newman,et al.  Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society , 2001 .

[55]  M. Lauria.  Reconstructing urban regime theory : regulating urban politics in a global economy , 1997 .