A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning

The increasing reliance on group decision-making in today's complex business environments and advances in microcomputer, telecommunications and graphic presentation technology have combined to create a growing interest in the design of group decision support systems (GDSS). Planning is an important group decision-making activity within organizations. Effective planning depends on the generation and analysis of innovative ideas. For this reason, the idea generation and management process has been chosen as the domain for the study of the design and implementation of a GDSS to support complex, unstructured group decision processes within organizations.The MIS Planning and Decision Laboratory has been constructed to provide a research facility for the study of the planning and decision process while top executives from a variety of organizations use the laboratory to conduct actual planning sessions for their organization. This paper presents the design of a system to support the idea generation and analysis process in organization planning. Results of research conducted in the MIS Planning and Decision Laboratory on the use of the Electronic Brainstorming system with over 100 planners from a variety of organizations are presented and discussed.The findings of the research indicate that computer brainstorming stimulates task oriented behavior, decreases group interactions and equalizes participation. Information presentation, network speed and typing skills of the upper level managers were identified as possible inhibitors of the idea generation process that must be considered in the design of the system and the methodology for its use. Planners using the GDSS reported high levels of satisfaction with the process and outcome of the planning sessions. They rated the computer as an important tool for idea generation and the computer brainstorming process as "Much Better" than manual brainstorming.

[1]  L. Phillips A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[2]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[3]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Introduction and Use of Idea-Generating Methods , 1978 .

[4]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[5]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  A comparison of individual, subgroup, and total group methods of problem solving. , 1974 .

[6]  J. D. Foley,et al.  The art of natural graphic man-machine conversation , 1974, SIGGRAPH 1974.

[7]  John M. Carroll Presentation and Form in User Interface Architecture. , 1983 .

[8]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Metaphor and the Cognitive Representation of Computing Systems , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Victor H. Vroom,et al.  The consequences of social interaction in group problem solving , 1969 .

[10]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[11]  William K. Graham,et al.  Brainstorming on a "hot" problem: Effects of training and practice on individual and group performance. , 1972 .

[12]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Training, motivation, and personality as determinants of the effectiveness of brainstorming groups and individuals. , 1972, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Group decision support systems: a new frontier , 1984, DATB.

[14]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[15]  William K. Graham,et al.  Tasks and Task Consequences as Factors in Individual and Group brainstorming , 1975 .

[16]  Andre L. Delbecq,et al.  NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUES FOR INVOLVING CLIENTS AND RESOURCE EXPERTS IN PROGRAM PLANNING. , 1970 .

[17]  John A. Glover,et al.  The Creative Production of the Group , 1978 .

[18]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. , 1969 .

[19]  Fredric M. Jabljn CULTIVATING IMAGINATION: FACTORS THAT ENHANCE AND INHIBIT CREATIVITY IN BRAINSTORMING GROUPS , 1981 .

[20]  J. Davitz,et al.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Potential inhibitory effects of group participation on brainstorming performance , 1977 .

[22]  Lyle Sussman,et al.  AN EXPLORATION OF COMMUNICATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN REAL BRAINSTORMING GROUPS , 1978 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system , 1981, CACM.

[24]  T. Gerrity The design of man-machine decision systems. , 1970 .

[25]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[26]  S. Kiesler The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[27]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[28]  James D. Foley,et al.  The art of natural graphic man—Machine conversation , 1974 .

[29]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[30]  J. Spry Creative management. , 1986, Inforum.

[31]  E. Matthews PATTERNS OF DISCOVERY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES , 1973 .