Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainty on Airport Surface Operations

Flights spend significantly more time taxiing on the airport surface during periods when the departure demand exceeds airport capacity, resulting in excessive fuel burn. Departure metering by holding aircraft at the gate during periods of congestion has been shown to yield benefits by lowering the taxi-out time. However, an important aspect of this problem that has not been understood well is the impact of uncertainty in departure demand. Recently, some airlines are beginning to publish an expected time that the flights are ready to pushback, which is referred to as Earliest Off-Block Time (EOBT). Tactical decisions for departure metering need to bemade with the EOBT information. However, the EOBT published by airlines is often found to deviate from the actual gate out time without departure metering, which represents an error in the EOBT estimate. Hence, it is important to consider errors in EOBT information while analyzing benefits from departure metering. In this paper, we present a queuing network model to predict aircraft taxi-times on the airport surface. The predictions from the queue model are used for departure metering with NASA’s ATD-2 logic that is being used in field trials at Charlotte airport. The framework allows us to quantify the reduction in departure metering benefits due to errors in EOBT information. The analysis reveals that the benefits reduce significantly due to EOBT uncertainty which has important implications for future departure metering applications, such as through the Terminal Flight Data Manager (TFDM) platform.

[1]  Hamsa Balakrishnan,et al.  Control of a non-stationary tandem queue model of the airport surface , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[2]  Fabio Grandi,et al.  Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT 2b) , 2015 .

[3]  Harshad Khadilkar,et al.  DEMONSTRATION OF REDUCED AIRPORT CONGESTION THROUGH PUSHBACK RATE CONTROL , 2014 .

[4]  Hamsa Balakrishnan,et al.  Dynamic Control of Airport Departures: Algorithm Development and Field Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Hamsa Balakrishnan,et al.  Optimal control of airport pushbacks in the presence of uncertainties , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[6]  Harshad Khadilkar,et al.  Networked control of aircraft operations at airports and in terminal areas , 2013 .

[7]  Hanbong Lee,et al.  Taxi Time Prediction at Charlotte Airport Using Fast-Time Simulation and Machine Learning Techniques , 2015 .

[8]  Malur K. Sundareshan,et al.  Numerical Methods for Modeling Computer Networks Under Nonstationary Conditions , 1990, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  Nicolas Pujet Modeling and control of the departure process of congested airports , 1999 .

[10]  Zhifan Zhu,et al.  Validation of Simulations of Airport Surface Traffic with the Surface Operations Simulator and Scheduler , 2013 .

[11]  Nikolas Pyrgiotis,et al.  An Analytical Queuing Model of Airport Departure Processes for Taxi Out Time Prediction , 2010 .

[12]  Bimal Aponso,et al.  Identifying Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Integrated Arrival, Departure, Surface Operations by Surveying Stakeholder Preferences , 2015 .

[13]  Harshad Khadilkar,et al.  Estimation of aircraft taxi fuel burn using flight data recorder archives , 2012 .

[14]  Sujata Banerjee,et al.  A simple approximation for modeling nonstationary queues , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.