A relatedness analysis approach for regulation comparison and e-rulemaking applications

The process of e-rulemaking with participation from the public involves a non-trivial task of sorting through and organizing a massive volume of electronically submitted comments. This research proposes to make use of available Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to help describe the relationship of public comments to policy drafts and deliberations. Based on previous work on regulatory management and comparisons, a relatedness analysis tool has been prototyped and applied to compare drafted regulations with the associated public comments. An example using a drafted regulation on rights-of-way access and the comments received by the Access Board is employed to illustrate the prototyped analysis tool. The drafted regulation and public comments are compared using not only a traditional term match but also a combination of feature matches, and not only content comparison but also structural analysis. This comparison framework helps review of comments with respect to provisions in the draft. Examples of results are shown to illustrate the use and limitations of ICT to support policy making.

[1]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  CiteSeer: an autonomous Web agent for automatic retrieval and identification of interesting publications , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[3]  Berthier A. Ribeiro-Neto,et al.  Local versus global link information in the Web , 2003, TOIS.

[4]  Berthier A. Ribeiro-Neto,et al.  Link-based and content-based evidential information in a belief network model , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[5]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  A software infrastructure for regulatory information management and compliance assistance , 2003 .

[6]  Leon Sterling,et al.  JUSTICE: a judicial search tool using intelligent concept extraction , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[7]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[8]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Automatic text representation, classification and labeling in European law , 2001, ICAIL '01.

[9]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  An Information Infrastructure for Government Regulations , 2003 .

[10]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Building intelligent legal information systems , 1994 .

[11]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Abstracting of legal cases: the SALOMON experience , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[12]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Building intelligent legal information systems : representation and reasoning in law , 1994 .

[13]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Logic-based regulation compliance-assistance , 2003, ICAIL.

[14]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[16]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  A Connectivity Analysis Approach to Increasing Precision in Retrieval From Hyperlinked Documents , 1999, TREC.

[17]  Gerard Salton,et al.  The SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Processing , 1971 .

[18]  C. Coglianese.  E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and the Regulatory Process , 2004 .

[19]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Regulatory Information Management and Compliance Assistance , 2003, DG.O.

[20]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  A comparative analysis framework for semi-structured documents, with applications to government regulations , 2004 .

[21]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Similarity analysis on government regulations , 2003, KDD '03.

[22]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..