Re-injecting spontaneity and balance in family life: parents' perspectives on recreation in families that include children with developmental disability.

METHODS Grounded in the naturalistic paradigm, a mixed-method research design (survey questionnaire, n = 65; and interview, n = 16) was used to explore the nature and benefits of, and constraints to, family recreation in families that included children with developmental disability. Statistical analyses were conducted on the quantitative data, while key theme and constant comparative methods were used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS These analyses revealed that family recreation most often involved small combinations of family members - usually mothers and their children - in physical recreation activities (e.g. swimming, walking, bike riding). Parents viewed these interactions as beneficial for enhancing family relationships and providing children, particularly those with a disability, opportunities for skill and self development within an accepting and supportive environment. Difficulties in coordinating family members schedules, finding activities to accommodate wide age and skill ranges, planning demands, and limitations in marketing and promotional materials were among the constraints most commonly identified in relation to the family as a whole and the children with developmental disability. Links to existing family and leisure research, family systems theory, and considerations for future research also are discussed.

[1]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[2]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[4]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[5]  Valeria J. Freysinger Leisure with Children and Parental Satisfaction: Further Evidence of a Sex Difference in the Experience of Adult Roles and Leisure. , 1994 .

[6]  J. Blacher Transition to adulthood: mental retardation, families, and culture. , 2001, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[7]  J. Horna The leisure component of the parental role. , 1989 .

[8]  J. Kelly,et al.  Changing Issues in Leisure-Family Research-Again , 1997 .

[9]  R. Hastings,et al.  Positive impact of children with developmental disabilities on their families: A preliminary study , 2002 .

[10]  K. Henderson,et al.  Dimensions of Choice: A Qualitative Approach to Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Research , 1991 .

[11]  J. Horna Married Life and Leisure: A Multidimensional Study of Couples , 1993 .

[12]  P. Ferguson A Place in the Family An Historical Interpretation of Research on Parental Reactions to Having a Child with a Disability , 2002 .

[13]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Impact of Life-Cycle Stage and Gender on the Ability to Balance Work and Family Responsibilities. , 1994 .

[14]  S. Shaw Controversies and contradictions in family leisure: an analysis of conflicting paradigms. , 1997 .

[15]  T. Holman,et al.  Family and Leisure: A Review of the Literature with Research Recommendations , 1984 .

[16]  J. Mactavish,et al.  Playing together growing together: Parents' perspectives on the benefits of family recreation in families that include children with a developmental disability , 1998 .

[17]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .

[18]  Jarmila L. A. Horna The study of leisure: an introduction. , 1994 .

[19]  L. Glidden What we do not know about families with children who have developmental disabilities: Questionnaire on Resources and Stress as a case study. , 1993, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[20]  M. W. Krauss Child-related and parenting stress: similarities and differences between mothers and fathers of children with disabilities. , 1993, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[21]  Joe F. Piftman Work/Family Fit as a Mediator of Work Factors on Marital Tension: Evidence from the Interface of Greedy Institutions , 1994 .

[22]  S. Merriam Case Study Research in Education , 1988 .

[23]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[24]  L. Powers,et al.  Families, Disability, and Empowerment: Active Coping Skills and Strategies for Family Interventions. , 1993 .

[25]  U. Bronfenbrenner The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and , 1979 .

[26]  R. Darling,et al.  Ordinary Families, Special Children: A Systems Approach to Childhood Disability, Third Edition, , 1989 .

[27]  L. Hendry,et al.  Young people's leisure and lifestyles. , 1993 .

[28]  P. Ferguson Mapping the Family: Disability Studies and the Exploration of Parental Response to Disability , 2001 .

[29]  L. Powers,et al.  Contributing to resilience in families: An overview. , 1993 .

[30]  K. Tice Ordinary families, special children, a systems approach to childhood disability , 1991 .

[31]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[32]  Stuart J. Schleien,et al.  Community recreation and people with disabilities : strategies for inclusion , 1997 .

[33]  S. Shaw Dereifying family leisure: An examination of women's and men's everyday experiences and perceptions of family time , 1992 .

[34]  G. Singer Suggestions for a Pragmatic Program of Research on Families and Disability , 2002 .

[35]  Jay A. Mancini,et al.  Leisure Impacts on Family Interaction and Cohesion , 1990 .

[36]  P. Witt,et al.  The relationships between barriers to leisure enjoyment and family stages , 1981 .

[37]  J. J. Gallagher,et al.  Severely handicapped young children and their families : research in review , 1984 .

[38]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[39]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[40]  N. Bridge,et al.  Leisure, integration and community. , 1992 .

[41]  Ann P. Turnbull,et al.  Families, Professionals, and Exceptionality: A Special Partnership , 1986 .