Creating change and driving innovation in highly automated and lean organizations: The Temporal Think Tank TM (T3 TM )

This paper introduces the concept of the temporal think tank(TM) (T3(TM)), a temporary in-house research center, based on case studies with a highly automated global manufacturer and in various small-sized manufacture (SME's). The T3(TM) brings individuals from across the organization together in a team setting in which they are charged to look at the future, develop their decision-making skills, and use entrepreneurial thinking to incubate new processes and/or products. After an appropriate time in the temporal think tank(TM), the individuals are asked to return to their regular positions to implement the best practices and best ideas and doing so spur the organization forward. At intervals, the temporal think tanks(TM) can be reconvened, or reconstituted with new participants. This approach prepares technology champions for the SME, who can return to the organization with a fresh outlook and renewed energy to keep the enterprise at the peak of efficiency and effectiveness.

[1]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[2]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[3]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A Strategic Technology Planning Framework: A Case of Taiwan's Semiconductor Foundry Industry , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[5]  Robert Wood How Strategic Innovation Really Gets Started , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[7]  M. J. Stahl,et al.  Weighted productivity in R & D: Some associated individual and organizational variables , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Paul Duguid,et al.  Creativity Versus Structure: A Useful Tension , 2001 .

[9]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[10]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[11]  K. Starkey How Organizations Learn , 1996 .

[12]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The innovation value chain. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[13]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[14]  U. Haner Spaces for Creativity and Innovation in Two Established Organizations , 2005 .

[15]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Innovation : driving product, process, and market change , 2002 .

[16]  Frederick Betz,et al.  Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change , 1997 .

[17]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[18]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[19]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  National Technology Foresight Activities Around the Globe , 1999 .