Fluctuations in repressor control: thermodynamic constraints on stochastic focusing.

The influence of fluctuations in molecule numbers on genetic control circuits has received considerable attention. The consensus has been that such fluctuations will make regulation less precise. In contrast, it has more recently been shown that signal fluctuations can sharpen the response in a regulated process by the principle of stochastic focusing (SF) (, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:7148-7153). In many cases, the larger the fluctuations are, the sharper is the response. Here we investigate how fluctuations in repressor or corepressor numbers can improve the control of gene expression. Because SF is found to be constrained by detailed balance, this requires that the control loops contain driven processes out of equilibrium. Some simple and realistic out-of-equilibrium steps that will break detailed balance and make room for SF in such systems are discussed. We conclude that when the active repressors are controlled by corepressor molecules that display large ("coherent") number fluctuations or when corepressors can be irreversibly removed directly from promoter-bound repressors, the response in gene activity can become significantly sharper than without intrinsic noise. A simple experimental design to establish the possibility of SF for repressor control is suggested.

[1]  J. Ninio Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. , 1975, Biochimie.

[2]  C Blomberg,et al.  Thermodynamic constraints on kinetic proofreading in biosynthetic pathways. , 1980, Biophysical journal.

[3]  M. Savageau Biochemical Systems Analysis: A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology , 1976 .

[4]  R. Thompson,et al.  Proofreading of the codon-anticodon interaction on ribosomes. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Trade-off between segregational stability and metabolic burden: a mathematical model of plasmid ColE1 replication control. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  C Blomberg,et al.  Mass action relations in vivo with application to the lac operon. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  P. Guptasarma,et al.  Does replication-induced transcription regulate synthesis of the myriad low copy number proteins of Escherichia coli? , 1995, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[9]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[10]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Is there proofreading during polypeptide synthesis? , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[11]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Direct experimental evidence for kinetic proofreading in amino acylation of tRNAIle. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[13]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[16]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Random signal fluctuations can reduce random fluctuations in regulated components of chemical regulatory networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[17]  Donald M. Crothers,et al.  Physical Chemistry: with Applications to the Life Sciences , 1979 .

[18]  M. S. Ko Induction mechanism of a single gene molecule: stochastic or deterministic? , 1992, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[19]  O. Berg A model for the statistical fluctuations of protein numbers in a microbial population. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Fluctuations and quality of control in biological cells: zero-order ultrasensitivity reinvestigated. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[22]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.