Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration.

Four experiments used the visual search paradigm to examine feature integration mechanisms. Reaction time to determine the presence or absence of a conjunctive target is relatively fast and exhaustive for low-density displays. Search rate is slow and self-terminating for high-density displays. Density effects do not arise when the target is defined by a unique feature. Two mechanisms are proposed for feature integration. A fast mechanism integrates features on the basis of coarse location information coded with the initial registration of the features. This coarse location mechanism requires that display items be spaced apart. A second, slower mechanism is used when objects are clumped together. The 2-mechanism hypothesis provides a resolution to conflicting findings in the visual search and illusory-conjunction literature. A possible interpretation of the findings with a single guided search mechanism for feature integration is also discussed.

[1]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[2]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[3]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  T. Troscianko,et al.  AI and the eye , 1990 .

[6]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  M. R. Houck,et al.  Conjunction of color and form without attention: evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  C. R. Snyder.  Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  S W Keele,et al.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[16]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[17]  R. Rafal,et al.  Attention and Feature Integration: Illusory Conjunctions in a Patient with a Parietal Lobe Lesion , 1991 .

[18]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Ivry,et al.  Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[22]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  F. Crick.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R Klein,et al.  Search performance without eye movements , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Townsend.  Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time ☆ , 1976 .

[27]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Properties, Parts, and Objects , 1986 .

[32]  Elizabeth L Bjork,et al.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing. , 1977, Psychological review.

[33]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.