Energy consumption analysis of MANET routing protocols based on mobility models

MANET routing protocols show different performance in different mobile network scenarios. To know which protocol is better than another in different mobile network scenarios, four mobility models are proposed for simulating different scenarios of mobile ad hoc networks. Also a byte-based energy consumption evaluation methodology is introduced for the protocol assessment. The experiment built upon mobility models shows that TORA can cause too much energy consumption on large-sized network and is more fit for the mobile ad hoc network with low node mobility, while AODV, DSR, and especially DSDV performs well on energy consumption for the mobile ad hoc network with high node mobility.

[1]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[2]  Vincent Park,et al.  Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) Version 1 Functional Specification , 2001 .

[3]  Li La-yuan Performance Analysis and Comparison of Mobile Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols , 2008 .

[4]  Geetha Jayakumar,et al.  Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model , 2008 .

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[6]  Gopinath Ganapathy,et al.  Performance Comparison of Mobile Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocol , 2007 .

[7]  Rosilah Hassan,et al.  Performance of AODV routing protocol in Mobile Ad Hoc Network , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology.

[8]  Anne Aaron,et al.  Performance Comparison of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols for Networks with Node Energy Constraints , 2001 .

[9]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[10]  T. Ravichandran,et al.  An Investigation about Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols in MANET , 2010 .

[11]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Perfect simulation and stationarity of a class of mobility models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[12]  . P.E.Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Performance Analysis of Three Routing Protocols in Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2006 .

[13]  V. P. Arunachala,et al.  An Investigation on Performance Analysis and Comparison of Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network , 2010 .

[14]  Zuriati Ahmad Zulkarnain,et al.  Performance analysis of random-based mobility models in MANET routing protocol. , 2009 .

[15]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[16]  Parveen Kakkar,et al.  Traffic Pattern based performance comparison of Reactive and Proactive protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks , 2010 .

[17]  Eryk Dutkiewicz,et al.  A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, Ad Hoc Networks.

[18]  Aditya Goel,et al.  Performance Analysis of Mobile Ad-hoc Network Using AODV Protocol , 2009 .

[19]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Basagni/Ad Hoc Networking , 2004 .

[20]  Hui Peng,et al.  How Node Mobility Impacts Reactive Ad Hoc Routing Protocols , 2011 .

[21]  Alankar Shastri,et al.  Performance Study of Ad-Hoc Reactive Routing Protocols , 2010 .