Measuring the Relevance of Evaluation Criteria among Health Information Seekers on the Internet

This study identified the criteria that are valued among Internet users when rating and accessing health information on the World Wide Web. Participants (N = 578) successfully completed a Web-based survey by ranking 12 criteria for evaluating health information. Then, by applying those same evaluation criteria, rated the quality of three preselected health-related websites and indicated their preference for one of the three sites. Six criteria including content, design and aesthetics, currency of information and contact addresses were significant predictors for selecting high-quality health information on the Internet. However, compared to their perceived importance, participants' perceptions about quality health information on the Internet were not consistent when selecting quality websites. This study identified the implications for evaluation criteria among Internet users, health professionals and website developers.

[1]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  G. Bamossy,et al.  Consumer behavior: a European perspective , 1999 .

[3]  D H Gustafson,et al.  Access to health information and support: a public highway or a private road? , 1998, JAMA.

[4]  R B Friedman,et al.  Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  Allan V. Abbott,et al.  Pilot Study of a Rating Instrument for Medical Education Web Sites , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Wired for health and well-being : the emergence of interactive health communication , 1999 .

[7]  S L Lusk,et al.  Healthy People 2010 , 2001, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[8]  S. McLeod,et al.  The quality of medical information on the Internet. A new public health concern. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  Paul Kim,et al.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  D. Gustafson,et al.  An Evidence-Based Approach to Interactive Health Communication: A Challenge to Medicine in the Information Age , 1998 .

[12]  R M Weiler,et al.  The SiteLegend: twelve components of a new strategy for providing website documentation. , 2000, The Journal of school health.

[13]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[14]  K Adelhard,et al.  Evaluation of Medical Internet Sites , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[15]  Jo Ann Oravec.  On-Line Medical Information and Service Delivery: Implications for Health Education , 2000 .

[16]  Charles J. Fornaciari,et al.  Age of Clutter: Conducting Effective Research Using the Internet , 1999 .

[17]  S. Michael.  Handbook in research and evaluation , 1971 .