An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling

Abstract This research proposes an integrated benchmarking framework illustrated in the context of a large supply chain system comprised of 102 distribution centers (DCs). We employ recent extensions of data envelopment analysis while addressing difficulties often associated with empirical data in real life settings. The study measures DC productivity in a large scale setting, evaluates and identifies DCs with consistent best performance using facet analysis, and detects performance trends using window analysis of 4 years’ data. This extensive evaluation of the empirical production frontier and of “role model” DCs provided very interesting insights for strategically managing operations. Our approach opens up possible new directions for examining supply chain DCs or other activities where explicit knowledge about the relationship between the inputs and outputs is not well known.

[1]  B. Golany,et al.  Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[2]  Patrick L. Brockett,et al.  Statistics & probability & their applications , 1985 .

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[4]  L. Seiford,et al.  Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis , 1990 .

[5]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When giants learn to dance : mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s , 1992 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[7]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: an extended facet approach , 1996 .

[8]  Joseph Sarkis.  An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States , 2000 .

[9]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  A statistical test for detecting influential observations in DEA , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[12]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[13]  Philip B. Schary,et al.  Evaluating Logistics Decisions , 1989 .

[14]  T. Davis.  Effective supply chain management , 2020, Strategic Direction.

[15]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR-efficiency of U.S. independent oil/gas producers over time , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  J. Kemperman,et al.  Statistical Recognition of Trends in Health Monitoring Systems , 1980, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[17]  R. Banker.  Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[18]  Anthony D. Ross,et al.  Reconfiguring the Supply Network Using Current Performance Data , 1998 .

[19]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Public Enterprise Economics.@@@The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement. , 1987 .

[20]  C. Weber.  A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance , 1996 .

[21]  P. C. Nutt.  Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organizations fail , 1999 .

[22]  Richard L. Clarke.  Evaluating USAF vehicle maintenance productivity over time: An application of data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[23]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  Global Supply Chain Management at Digital Equipment Corporation , 1995 .

[24]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[25]  A. Charnes,et al.  Invariant multiplicative efficiency and piecewise cobb-douglas envelopments , 1983 .