Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments

Five experiments explored the influence of repeated phonemes on the production of short utterances. In Experiment 1 coloured object naming showed faster latencies when colour and object started with the same phoneme (‘green goat’) than when they did not; the opposite was found when colour and object were named on consecutive trials (‘green’ – ‘goat’). Experiments 2 and 3 focused on adjective-noun phrases and showed no effect of repeated phonemes on either acoustical duration of speeded responses, or latencies in a delayed variant of the task, suggesting a higher-level – rather than articulatory – locus of the effect. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that the facilitation induced by repeated segments is not specific to word onset (‘green chain’) and is independent of whether or not the repeated phonemes occupy the same within-word position (‘green flag’). These results indicate that in the production of multiple words, word forms are concurrently activated and evoke phonological segments represented in a position-nonspecific manner.

[1]  D. G. MacKay Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[3]  D. G. MacKay The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech , 1972 .

[4]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[5]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[6]  K Rayner,et al.  Stages of processing in word identification. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[8]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length , 1983 .

[9]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences , 1984 .

[10]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  The lexicon in a model of language production , 1985 .

[11]  D. Meyer,et al.  Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features , 1985 .

[12]  A. Ellis Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[13]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Programming of Complex Sequences: Evidence from the Timing of Rapid Speech and Other Productions , 1986 .

[14]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[15]  Erik Fudge,et al.  Branching structure within the syllable , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Motor Programs and Hierarchical Organization in the Control of Rapid Speech , 1988 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  D. Meyer,et al.  Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech , 1990 .

[20]  S. Portier,et al.  Practice and the dynamics of handwriting performance: evidence for a shift of motor programming load. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[22]  M G Fischman,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Motor Behavior Influence of Extended Practice on Programming Time, Movement Time, and Transfer in Simple Target-striking Responses , 2022 .

[23]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Models of form-related priming in com-prehension and production , 1992 .

[24]  A W Ellis,et al.  Phonological priming of lexical retrieval in speech production. , 1992, British journal of psychology.

[25]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  W. Verwey Effects of extended practice in a one-finger keypressing task. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[27]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[28]  H. Pashler Overlapping Mental Operations in Serial Performance with Preview , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked Priming of Word and Picture Naming: The Role of Syllabic Units ☆ , 1996 .

[31]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[33]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[34]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Phonological Segments and Features as Planning Units in Speech Production , 1999 .

[35]  H. Schriefers Phonological Facilitation in the Production of Two-word Utterances , 1999 .

[36]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Parallelism in the Production of Noun Phrases: Experiments and Reaction Time Models. , 1999 .

[37]  Michael P. Sullivan,et al.  The Nature of Phonological Encoding During Spoken Word Retrieval , 1999 .

[38]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[39]  F. Ferreira,et al.  How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .

[40]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  N. Dumay Effects of vocabulary acquisition on lexical competition in speech perception and production, by M. Gareth Gaskell and Nicolas Dumay , 2003 .

[43]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[44]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production , 2003 .

[46]  M. Damian Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[48]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .

[50]  A. Braun,et al.  Temporal dissociation of early lexical access and articulation using a delayed naming task--an FMRI study. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Clive Frankish,et al.  SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams , 2007 .

[53]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production , 2007 .

[55]  Clive Frankish,et al.  Short Article: Lexical and Sublexical Processes in the Perception of Transposed-Letter Anagrams , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A Word-Order Constraint on Phonological Activation , 2008, Psychological science.

[57]  Hugo Quené,et al.  Self-Monitoring and Feedback: A New Attempt to Find the Main Cause of Lexical Bias in Phonological Speech Errors. , 2008 .

[58]  A. Roelofs Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.