Green School Grounds as Sites for Outdoor Learning: Barriers and Opportunities

In their review of evidence-based research entitled A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning, Rickinson et al. (2004) identify five key constraints that limit the amount of outdoor learning. This paper explores whether green school grounds might be a location where these constraints could be minimised. Specifically, it reports on a study that sought to investigate the use of green school grounds as sites for outdoor learning, to identify barriers that impede such use, and to examine how these barriers differ from those cited in Rickinson et al.’s review. A mixed method approach was used: (1) 149 questionnaires were completed by administrators, teachers, and parents associated with 45 school ground greening initiatives in a Canadian school board; (2) 21 follow-up interviews were completed at five of the schools. Study participants reported that green school grounds are used regularly for teaching some subjects, notably science and physical education, but considerably less for teaching language arts, mathematics, and geography. They also identified a series of barriers that limit the amount of outdoor learning and these are compared to those identified by Rickinson et al. (2004). This paper concludes with a discussion of how the opportunities for teaching and learning on green school grounds can be more fully maximised.

[1]  Patrik Grahn Ute pa dagis , 1997 .

[2]  S. Ham,et al.  Barriers to Environmental Education , 1988 .

[3]  David Hawkins,et al.  The Edible Schoolyard. , 1999 .

[4]  Tom Puk,et al.  The Diluted Curriculum: The Role of Government in Developing EcologicalLiteracy as the First Imperative in Ontario Secondary Schools , 2003 .

[5]  Mark Rickinson,et al.  A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning , 2004 .

[6]  J. Dyment “At That Age, You Just Accept What You Have You Never Question Things”: Student Participation in School Ground Greening , 2004, Children, Youth and Environments.

[7]  S. Ham,et al.  Toward a Theory of Commitment To Environmental Education Teaching. , 1997 .

[8]  H. Hammatt Design Under Fire Designers can reduce the risk of wildfires by facing the challenge with advanced planning and reduction of fuel loads , 2000 .

[9]  G. A. Lieberman,et al.  Closing the Achievement Gap: Using the Environment as an Integrating Context for Learning. Executive Summary. , 1998 .

[10]  Tim D. Grant,et al.  Greening school grounds : creating habitats for learning , 2001 .

[11]  John A. Fisher The demise of fieldwork as an integral part of science education in United Kingdom schools: a victim of cultural change and political pressure? , 2001 .

[12]  Linda L. Cronin-Jones The Effectiveness of Schoolyards as Sites for Elementary Science Instruction , 2000 .

[13]  E. Masini,et al.  Children's participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care , 1998 .

[14]  Jrene Rahm,et al.  Emergent learning opportunities in an inner‐city youth gardening program , 2002 .

[15]  G. Mannion Children's participation in school grounds developments: creating a place for education that promotes children's social inclusion , 2003 .

[16]  J. Alexander,et al.  Master Gardener Classroom Garden Project: An Evaluation of the Benefits to Children , 1995 .

[17]  K. Nolan,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Research in Environmental Education , 1999 .

[18]  J. Dyment Gaining Ground: The Power and Potential of School Ground Greening in the Toronto District School Board , 2005 .

[19]  R. Hart,et al.  The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care , 1997 .

[20]  H. Konoshima PARTICIPATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN IN AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AT SCHOOL FARMS IN SHIGA PREFECTURE , 1995 .

[21]  Marco Huttenmoser,et al.  Children and Their Living Surroundings: Empirical Investigations into the Significance of Living Surroundings for the Everyday Life and Development of Children. , 1995 .

[22]  D. Simmons,et al.  Using Natural Settings for Environmental Education: Perceived Benefits and Barriers. , 1998 .

[23]  D. Buckingham The Commercialisation of Childhood? The Place of the Market in Children's Media Culture , 1995 .

[24]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Nature-based Excursions: School Students' Perceptions of Learning in Natural Environments , 2002 .

[25]  Margarette R. Harvey The Relationship between Children's Experiences with Vegetation on School Grounds and Their Environmental Attitudes , 1990 .

[26]  William Scott,et al.  Sustainable Development and Learning: framing the issues , 2003 .

[27]  P. Tranter,et al.  School Grounds as Sites for Learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities , 2003 .

[28]  Robin C. Moore,et al.  Natural Learning: The Life of an Environmental Schoolyard. Creating Environments for Rediscovering Nature's Way of Teaching. , 1997 .

[29]  A. Bell Engaging Spaces: On School-based Habitat Restoration , 2001 .

[30]  Irene Canaris Growing Foods for Growing Minds: Integrating Gardening and Nutrition Education into the Total Curriculum. , 1995 .

[31]  Wendy Titman,et al.  Special Places; Special People: The Hidden Curriculum of School Grounds. , 1994 .

[32]  Rachel Mabie,et al.  A Comparison of Experiential Instructional Strategies upon the Science Process Skills of Urban Elementary Students. , 1996 .

[33]  Grounds for Improvement. Secondary Action Research Programme , 2004 .

[34]  Stephen Trimble,et al.  The Geography of Childhood: Why Children Need Wild Places , 1994 .