IPO Liability and Entrepreneurial Response

This paper explores how legal liability in the IPO context can impact an entrepreneur's decision of whether and how to take a firm public. Liability under the Securities Act of 1933 effectively embeds a put option in an IPO security, where the entrepreneur must insure the shareholder against poor firm performance, which inflates the price of the security and exposes the entrepreneur to risk. This may cause IPO firms to appear to underperform relative to non-IPO firms as the option value decays, and may lead the entrepreneur to undertake strategic (but destructive) responses to minimize the put value and his exposure to risk. Because of the value-destroying characteristics of these responses - which include initial underpricing, entrenchment, lower NPV projects, asset partitioning, and reduced disclosure - this state of affairs is inefficient compared to a system where the entrepreneur can simply allocate the risk to shareholders. While the Securities Act's risk-allocation regime may provide some benefits in the form of more accurate disclosure, the availability of substitute responses by the entrepreneur makes any such benefit uncertain.

[1]  Randal C. Picker Simple Games in a Complex World: A Generative Approach to the Adoption of Norms , 1997 .

[2]  E. Posner,et al.  Transfer regulations and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2003, Duke law journal.

[3]  Lynn A. Stout The Mechanisms of Market Inefficiency: An Introduction to the New Finance , 2003 .

[4]  John R. Lott,et al.  Term limits and electoral competitiveness: Evidence from California’s state legislative races , 1997 .

[5]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Antitrust in the New Economy , 2000 .

[6]  D. Hensler Litigation costs and the underpricing of initial public offerings , 1995 .

[7]  J. Alexander Do the Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions , 1991 .

[8]  Lior Jacob Strahilevitz,et al.  The Right to Destroy , 2004 .

[9]  John R. Lott,et al.  How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government? , 1998 .

[10]  Alan O. Sykes,et al.  The safeguards mess: a critique of WTO jurisprudence , 2003, World Trade Review.

[11]  Alan Sykes,et al.  Terrorism and Insurance Markets: A Role for the Government as Insurer? , 2002 .

[12]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Private Broadcasters and the Public Interest: Notes Toward a 'Third Way' , 1999 .

[13]  John R. Lott,et al.  A Simple Explanation for Why Campaign Expenditures are Increasing: The Government is Getting Bigger , 1999 .

[14]  R. Romano Empowering Investors: A Market Approach to Securities Regulation , 1998 .

[15]  D. Baird,et al.  The Hidden Virtues of Chapter 11: An Overview of the Law and Economics of Financially Distressed Firms , 1997 .

[16]  Stephen Choi Regulating Investors Not Issuers: A Market-Based Proposal , 2000 .

[17]  Anjan V. Thakor,et al.  Litigation Risk, Intermediation, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings , 1992 .

[18]  Amitai Aviram Regulation by Networks , 2003 .

[19]  D. Baird,et al.  Bankruptcy Decision Making , 2001 .

[20]  P. J. Hughes Signalling by direct disclosure under asymmetric information , 1986 .

[21]  David A. Weisbach,et al.  Line Drawing, Doctrine, and Efficiency in the Tax Law , 1998 .

[22]  William M. Landes,et al.  Sequential versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis , 1993, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[23]  John R. Lott,et al.  Does a Helping Hand Put Others at Risk?: Affirmative Action, Police Departments, and Crime , 2000 .

[24]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Citations Analysis, with Special Reference to Law and Economics , 1999 .

[25]  D. Lichtman Property Rights in Emerging Platform Technologies , 1999, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[26]  N. Smelser The Rational Choice Perspective , 1992 .

[27]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Community, Wealth, and Equality , 1997 .

[28]  Chicago Unbound,et al.  Orwell versus Huxley: Economics, Technology, Privacy, and Satire , 1999 .

[29]  D. Baird,et al.  Does Bogart Still Get Scale? Rights of Publicity in the Digital Age , 2001 .

[30]  Jonathan A. Shayne,et al.  Inefficiency in the Market for Initial Public Offerings , 1995 .

[31]  W. Landes,et al.  Winning the Art Lottery: The Economic Returns to the Ganz Collection , 1999, Recherches économiques de Louvain.

[32]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  The Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation , 2004 .

[33]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing , 1990 .

[34]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Values and Consequences: An Introduction to Economic Analysis of Law , 1998 .

[35]  Richard A. Epstein,et al.  Animals as Objects, or Subjects, of Rights , 2002 .

[36]  F. Easterbrook Derivative Securities and Corporate Governance , 2002 .

[37]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Status Signaling and the Law, with Particular Application to Sexual Harassment , 1999 .

[38]  Richard A. Epstein Contracts Small and Contract Large: Contract Law through the Lens of Laissez-Faire , 2020, The Fall and Rise of Freedom of Contract.

[39]  Stephen Choi,et al.  Fraud in the New-Issues Market: Empirical Evidence on Securities Class Actions , 1996 .

[40]  R. Epstein,et al.  Transaction Costs and Property Rights: Or Do Good Fences Make Good Neighbors? , 1997 .

[41]  Randal C. Picker The Law and Economics of Contract Damages , 2000 .

[42]  Robert A. Prentice,et al.  Whither Securities Regulation? Some Behavioral Observations Regarding Proposals for Its Future , 2002 .

[43]  D. Weisbach,et al.  Should the Tax Law Require Current Accrual of Interest On Derivative Financial Instruments? , 1999 .

[44]  Alan O. Sykes,et al.  The Economics of Public International Law , 2004 .

[45]  Randal C. Picker Copyright as Entry Policy: The Case of Digital Distribution , 2002 .

[46]  Randal C. Picker The Digital Video Recorder: Unbundling Advertising and Content , 2003 .

[47]  J. Mark Ramseyer,et al.  The Market for Children: Evidence from Early Modern Japan , 1995 .

[48]  J. Ritter The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[49]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners Better Citizens? , 1998 .

[50]  Geoffrey P. Miller,et al.  Explaining Deviations from the Fifty-Percent Rule: A Multimodal Approach to the Selection of Cases for Litigation , 1996, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[51]  Alan O. Sykes,et al.  The Welfare Economics of Immigration Law , 1995 .

[52]  Luis Garicano,et al.  Hierarchies, Specialization, and the Utilization of Knowledge: Theory and Evidence from the Legal Services Industry , 2004 .

[53]  Christine Jolls,et al.  A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics , 1998 .

[54]  Douglas Lichtman,et al.  Rethinking Prosecution History Estoppel , 2003 .

[55]  Lisa E. Bernstein ‘The Questionable Empirical Basis of Article 2’s Incorporation Strategy: A Preliminary Study , 1999 .

[56]  Richard A. Epstein,et al.  In Defense of the 'Old' Public Health: The Legal Framework for the Regulation of Public Health , 2002 .

[57]  John R. Lott,et al.  Punitive Damages: Their Determinants, Effects on Firm Value, and the Impact of Supreme Court and Congressional Attempts to Limit Awards , 1998 .

[58]  John R. Lott,et al.  Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws: Contrasting Private and Public Law Enforcement , 1999 .

[59]  Daniel N. Shaviro Budget Deficits and the Intergenerational Distribution of Lifetime Consumption , 1995 .

[60]  Phil Drake,et al.  IPO Underpricing and Insurance Against Legal Liability , 1993 .

[61]  Eric A. Posner,et al.  A Theory of Contract Law under Conditions of Radical Judicial Error , 1999 .

[62]  John R. Lott,et al.  Environmental Violations, Legal Penalties, and Reputation Costs , 1999 .

[63]  R. Posner,et al.  The Long-Run Growth in Obesity as a Function of Technological Change , 1999, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[64]  Michael Perino Did the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Work , 2002 .

[65]  Disparities and Discrimination in Health Care Coverage: A Critique of The Institute of Medicine Study , 2005 .

[66]  A. Sykes An Introduction to Regression Analysis , 1993 .

[67]  J. Mark Ramseyer,et al.  Explicit Reasons for Implicit Contracts: The Legal Logic to the Japanese Main Bank System , 1993 .

[68]  Eric A. Posner,et al.  There are no Penalty Default Rules in Contract Law , 2005 .

[69]  William M. Landes,et al.  The Art of Law and Economics: An Autobiographical Essay , 1997 .

[70]  J. C. Spindler,et al.  Conflict or Credibility: Analyst Conflicts of Interest and the Market for Underwriting Business , 2004 .

[71]  Eric A. Posner,et al.  Is the International Court of Justice Biased , 2005 .

[72]  J. C. Spindler,et al.  Corporate Heroin: A Defense of Perks, Executive Loans, and Conspicuous Consumption , 2004 .

[73]  Randal C. Picker,et al.  Bankruptcy Rules, Managerial Entrenchment, and Firm-Specific Human Capital , 1993 .

[74]  Kenneth W. Dam Self‐Help in the Digital Jungle , 1999, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[75]  Allen Ferrell The Case for Mandatory Disclosure in Securities Regulation Around the World , 2004 .

[76]  Alan O. Sykes,et al.  Justice in immigration: The welfare economics of immigration law: a theoretical survey with an analysis of U.S. policy , 1992 .

[77]  P. Mahoney The Exchange as Regulator , 1997 .

[78]  Ulrich Kamecke,et al.  Pursuing a Remedy in Microsoft: The Declining Need for Centralized Coordination in a Networked World , 2002 .

[79]  Kenneth W. Dam,et al.  Chicago Unbound , 2018 .

[80]  Randal C. Picker,et al.  Regulating Network Industries: A Look at Intel , 1999 .

[81]  John C. Coates Private vs. Political Choice of Securities Regulation: A Political Cost/Benefit Analysis , 2001 .

[82]  George G. Triantis,et al.  Financial Contract Design in the World of Venture Capital , 2001 .

[83]  William M. Landes,et al.  Copyright Protection of Letters, Diaries, and Other Unpublished Works: An Economic Approach , 1992, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[84]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence , 1999 .

[85]  Randal C. Picker Understanding Statutory Bundles: Does the Sherman Act Come with the 1996 Telecommunications Act? , 2003 .

[86]  Julie Roin,et al.  Truth in Government: Beyond the Tax Expenditure Budget , 2002 .

[87]  Richard A. Epstein,et al.  The Ubiquity of the Benefit Principle , 1994 .

[88]  David D. Friedman,et al.  More Justice for Less Money , 1996, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[89]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does) , 1993, Supreme Court Economic Review.