Functional circuitry underlying visual neglect.

Visuospatial neglect is a common neurological syndrome caused by unilateral brain damage to the posterior and inferior parietal cerebral cortex, and is characterized by an inability to respond or orient to stimuli presented in the contralesional hemifield. Neglect has been elicited in experimental models of the rat, cat and monkey, and is thought to result in part from a pathological state of inhibition exerted on the damaged hemisphere by the hyperexcited intact hemisphere. We sought to test this theory by assessing neural activity levels in multiple brain structures during neglect using 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) as a metabolic marker of neural activity. Neglect was induced in two ways: (i) by cooling deactivation of posterior parietal cortex or (ii) in conjunction with broader cortical blindness produced by unilateral lesion of all contiguous visual cortical areas spanning occipital, parietal and temporal regions. The direction and magnitude of changes in 2DG uptake were measured in cerebral cortex and midbrain structures. Finally, the 2DG uptake was assessed in a group of cats in which the lesion-induced neglect component of blindness was cancelled by cooling of either the contralateral posterior parietal cortex or the contralateral superior colliculus (SC). Overall, we found that (i) both lesion- and cooling-induced neglect are associated with decreases in 2DG uptake in specific ipsilateral cortical and midbrain regions; (ii) levels of 2DG uptake in the intermediate and deep layers of the SC contralateral to both cooling and lesion deactivations are increased; (iii) changes in 2DG uptake were not identified in the contralateral cortex; and (iv) reversal of the lesion-induced neglect component of blindness is associated with a reduction of contralesional 2DG uptake to normal or subnormal levels. These data are in accord with theories of neglect that include mutually suppressive mechanisms between the two hemispheres, and we show that these mechanisms operate at the level of the SC, but are not apparent at the level of cortex. These results suggest that the most effective therapies for visual neglect will be those that act to decrease neural activity in the intermediate layers of the SC contralateral to the brain damage.

[1]  R. M. Beckstead,et al.  The lateral suprasylvian corticotectal projection in cats , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  W Singer,et al.  Metabolic mapping of visual areas in the behaving cat: A[14C]2‐deoxyglucose study , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[4]  Y. Shinoda,et al.  Commissural excitation and inhibition by the superior colliculus in tectoreticular neurons projecting to omnipause neuron and inhibitory burst neuron regions. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Chris Rorden,et al.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  M. Segraves,et al.  The afferent and efferent callosal connections of retinotopically defined areas in cat cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Mesulam Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[9]  T. Blackstad,et al.  Distribution of acetyl cholinesterase in the hippocampal region of the guinea pig , 2004, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[10]  L. Palmer,et al.  The retinotopic organization of lateral suprasylvian visual areas in the cat , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Sidney S. Simon,et al.  Merging of the Senses , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  A. Rosenquist,et al.  Recovery from cortical blindness mediated by destruction of nontectotectal fibers in the commissure of the superior colliculus in the cat , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J. Sprague,et al.  Interaction of Cortex and Superior Colliculus in Mediation of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cat , 1966, Science.

[14]  S G Lomber,et al.  Role of the superior colliculus in analyses of space: Superficial and intermediate layer contributions to visual orienting, auditory orienting, and visuospatial discriminations during unilateral and bilateral deactivations , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  G. Orban,et al.  Functional impact of cerebral projection systems , 1998, Molecular Psychiatry.

[16]  E. Bisiach,et al.  1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  H. Heller,et al.  The relationship of local cerebral glucose utilization to optical density ratios , 1983, Brain Research.

[18]  S G Lomber,et al.  Removal of two halves restores the whole: Reversal of visual hemineglect during bilateral cortical or collicular inactivation in the cat , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Sprague,et al.  Anatomical organization of pretectal nuclei and tectal laminae in the cat , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[21]  Claus C. Hilgetag,et al.  Restoration of visual orienting into a cortically blind hemifield by reversible deactivation of posterior parietal cortex or the superior colliculus , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  M. Behan,et al.  Sources of subcortical GABAergic projections to the superior colliculus in the cat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  S G Lomber,et al.  Reversible visual hemineglect. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B E Stein,et al.  Two visual corticotectal systems in cat. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. Innocenti,et al.  Callosal connections of suprasylvian visual areas in the cat , 1981, Neuroscience.

[26]  Finn A. GENnS Distribution of Acetyl Cholinesterase in the Hippocampal Region of the Guinea Pig , 1972 .

[27]  S. Sherman Visual Fields of Cats with Cortical and Tectal Lesions , 1974, Science.

[28]  Rodger A Weddell,et al.  Subcortical modulation of spatial attention including evidence that the Sprague effect extends to man , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  B. Payne,et al.  Functional impact of primary visual cortex deactivation on subcortical target structures in the thalamus and midbrain , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  L. Kruger,et al.  Topography of the retinal projection upon the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1970, Vision research.

[32]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  S G Lomber,et al.  Complex transcallosal interactions in visual cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  G A Orban,et al.  Functional impact of cerebral connections. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A. Peters,et al.  Transcallosal non‐pyramidal cell projections from visual cortex in the cat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  B E Stein,et al.  Unimodal and multimodal response properties of neurons in the cat's superior colliculus. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[37]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[38]  L. Bérubé,et al.  [Clinical neuropsychology]. , 1982, Nursing Quebec.

[39]  M P Young,et al.  Inter-hemispheric competition of sub-cortical structures is a crucial mechanism in paradoxical lesion effects and spatial neglect. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[40]  James M. Sprague,et al.  Chapter 1 Neural mechanisms of visual orienting responses , 1996 .

[41]  M. Sanders Comparative Neurology of the Optic Tectum , 1986 .

[42]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[44]  S G Lomber,et al.  Task-specific reversal of visual hemineglect following bilateral reversible deactivation of posterior parietal cortex: A comparison with deactivation of the superior colliculus , 2001, Visual Neuroscience.

[45]  P. May,et al.  Comparison of the distribution and somatodendritic morphology of tectotectal neurons in the cat and monkey , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[46]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Unit responses to visual stimuli in the cat's superior colliculus after removal of the visual cortex. , 1970, Brain research.

[47]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[48]  J. Harting Puffs and Patches: A Brief Chronological Review , 2003 .

[49]  A. Rosenquist,et al.  Ibotenic acid lesions in the pedunculopontine region result in recovery of visual orienting in the hemianopic cat , 2001, Neuroscience.

[50]  Bertram R. Payne,et al.  Functional circuitry underlying natural and interventional cancellation of visual neglect , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  B. Payne,et al.  Cerebral areas mediating visual redirection of gaze: Cooling deactivation of 15 loci in the cat , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[52]  J. T. Weber,et al.  Neuroanatomical studies of the nigrotectal projection in the cat , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[53]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Modulation and rehabilitation of spatial neglect by sensory stimulation. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[54]  M. Behan,et al.  Intrinsic circuitry in the cat superior colliculus: Projections from the superficial layers , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  Jean Bullier,et al.  Reversible deactivation of cerebral network components , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  B E Stein,et al.  Small lateral suprasylvian cortex lesions produce visual neglect and decreased visual activity in the superior colliculus , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  B. Payne,et al.  Bilateral impact of unilateral visual cortex lesions on the superior colliculus , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  S B Edwards,et al.  The commissural projection of the superior colliculus in the cat , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[59]  H. Vanegas,et al.  Comparative neurology of the optic tectum , 1984 .

[60]  Stephen G Lomber,et al.  The advantages and limitations of permanent or reversible deactivation techniques in the assessment of neural function , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[61]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[62]  W. C. Hall,et al.  The Superior Colliculus : New Approaches for Studying Sensorimotor Integration , 2003 .

[63]  E. Bisiach,et al.  rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect , 2001, Neurology.

[64]  M. Wong-Riley Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry , 1979, Brain Research.

[65]  B. Stein,et al.  Opposing basal ganglia processes shape midbrain visuomotor activity bilaterally , 2003, Nature.

[66]  J. K. Harting,et al.  The Mammalian Superior Colliculus: Studies of Its Morphology and Connections , 1984 .

[67]  L. Schmued A rapid, sensitive histochemical stain for myelin in frozen brain sections. , 1990, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[68]  Stephen G. Lomber,et al.  The cryoloop: an adaptable reversible cooling deactivation method for behavioral or electrophysiological assessment of neural function , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[69]  M. Cynader,et al.  Receptive fields in cat superior colliculus after visual cortex lesions. , 1975, Journal of Physiology.

[70]  A. Rosenquist,et al.  Ibotenic acid lesions of the lateral substantia nigra restore visual orientation behavior in the hemianopic cat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[71]  J. Sprague Neural mechanisms of visual orienting responses. , 1996, Progress in brain research.

[72]  B. V. Updyke,et al.  Corticotectal projections in the cat: Anterograde transport studies of twenty‐five cortical areas , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[73]  P Sterling,et al.  Influence of visual cortex on receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.