Teaching the Disembodied: Othering and Activity Systems in a Blended Synchronous Learning Situation.

This study examines what happens when online and campus students participate in real time in the same campus classroom. Before this study, postgraduate students studying online in a course intended primarily as professional development for language educators were taking the course through reading the course literature including assigned articles, writing reflective texts in the asynchronous forum and doing the course assignments. They had a very different experience than the campus students who met weekly for discussion of the reading. Some online students were not active enough in the course, and showed low levels of engagement. The online students were invited to participate in scheduled campus classes via Skype on iPads. After some hesitation, four of the six online students took up this real-time participation option. Initial difficulties with the technology were addressed after seeking input from campus and online students. A series of adjustments were made and evaluated, including a move to a model in which three online students in different locations participated in a single Skype group video call on a laptop in the campus classroom rather than on multiple individual Skype calls on iPads. After the course, the online and campus students were asked to evaluate the experience of having physical and virtual participants sharing a physical space and to relate this experience to the asynchronous channels previously available to the participants. The comments of both groups of participants were interpreted in the light of previous work on social presence and of activity theory. It appears that student beliefs and student expectations lead to hidden challenges associated with mixing these groups of students, and the study concludes that unless teaching assistance is available, it is not easy to afford online students the same right to speak as campus students.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[2]  M. Pritchard.  Thinking in Education , 1993 .

[3]  B. Nardi.  Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[4]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[5]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[6]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[8]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Activity Theory As a Lens for Characterizing the Participatory Unit. , 2004 .

[9]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[10]  D. Palfreyman.  Othering in an English Language Program , 2005 .

[11]  J. Brine,et al.  Students' perceptions of a selected aspect of a computer mediated academic writing program: An activity theory analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Michael Pardales,et al.  Community of Inquiry: Its past and present future , 2006 .

[13]  Richard L. Ramirez,et al.  Simultaneous Delivery of a Face-to-Face Course to On-Campus and Remote Off-Campus Students , 2010 .

[14]  Kerri-Lee Krause,et al.  The first year experience in Australian universities: findings from 1994 to 2009 , 2010 .

[15]  Norman Vaughan,et al.  Redesigning Online Learning for International Graduate Seminar Delivery. , 2010 .

[16]  Martha Cleveland Innes,et al.  Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment , 2012 .

[17]  Zehra Akyol,et al.  Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  David Annand,et al.  Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework. , 2011 .

[19]  JungJoo Kim,et al.  Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Rapport in distance education , 2012 .

[21]  Carol Hostetter,et al.  Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes , 2013 .

[22]  Nicola Westberry,et al.  Co-construction of knowledge in tertiary online settings: an ecology of resources perspective , 2013 .

[23]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Activity Theory Perspectives on Technology in Higher Education , 2013 .

[24]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Blended synchronous learning: patterns and principles for simultaneously engaging co-located and distributed learners , 2013 .