Comparison of time-harmonic and transient finite element calculation of a squirrel cage induction machine for electric vehicles

For predicting the performance characteristics of highly utilized induction machines, commonly finite element analysis (FEA) is applied. If only the stationary behavior is of interest, both time-harmonic and transient calculations are feasible. Both procedures offer benefits and drawbacks regarding precision and computing time. In this paper the stationary torque-slip-characteristic of a squirrel cage induction machine for electric vehicle application is calculated by means of time-harmonic and transient FEA. The simulation results are compared to measurements taken on the test bench. For low saturation levels the time-harmonic and transient simulation produce nearly equivalent stationary torque results. For high saturation levels, the commonly used approach for nonlinear time-harmonic calculation is to use a corrected magnetization curve. It is shown that the assumption of sinusoidal time variation of the magnetic field strength usually made in this case results in a torque error increasing with the saturation level for the time-harmonic calculation.

[1]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Numerical modelling and design of electrical machines and devices , 1999 .

[2]  Antero Arkkio,et al.  Analysis of induction motors based on the numerical solution of the magnetic field and circuit equations , 1987 .

[3]  T.A. Lipo,et al.  Modelling of saturated AC machines including air gap flux harmonic components , 1990, Conference Record of the 1990 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[4]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Finite element analysis of steady state behavior of squirrel cage induction motors compared with measurements , 1997 .

[5]  A.B.J. Reece,et al.  Induction motor analysis by time-stepping techniques , 1988 .

[6]  Gérard Meunier,et al.  Simulation of induction machine operation using complex magnetodynamic finite elements , 1989 .

[7]  Andreas Binder,et al.  Elektrische Maschinen und Antriebe , 2012 .

[8]  Nabeel A. O. Demerdash,et al.  A new approach for determination of eddy current and flux penetration in nonlinear ferromagnetic materials , 1974 .

[9]  Dimitris P. Labridis,et al.  Calculation of eddy current losses in nonlinear ferromagnetic materials , 1989 .

[10]  N. Bianchi,et al.  Fault– Tolerant PM Motors in Automotive Applications , 2005, 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[11]  G. Pellegrino,et al.  Comparison of Induction and PM Synchronous Motor Drives for EV Application Including Design Examples , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[12]  K. Preis,et al.  Determination of the starting and operational characteristics of a large squirrel cage induction motor using harmonic and transient FEM , 2008, 2008 18th International Conference on Electrical Machines.

[13]  Nguyen Phung Quang,et al.  Vector Control of Three-Phase AC Machines , 2015 .

[14]  Ion Boldea,et al.  The Induction Machines Design Handbook , 2009 .