Development of simple semiempirical models for calculating airflow through hopper, awning, and casement windows for single-sided natural ventilation

Abstract Natural ventilation is a promising approach to reducing building energy use if designed properly. Most of the previous design models for calculating airflow due to single-sided natural ventilation have been based on the assumption of simple openings. Since, most windows are not simple openings, but rather can create flow obstructions when opened; the impact of window structure on ventilation needs to be accounted for in order to accurately predict the ventilation rate in buildings. This paper presents an experimental and numerical evaluation of the impact of three types of windows—hopper, awning, and casement—on airflow in the case of single-sided natural ventilation. Semiempirical models for predicting the ventilation rate were developed for these window types and validated by both large-eddy simulations and full-scale measurements. In general, the predictions agreed with the measured results within an error of 25%, and the new models can be used for the design of natural ventilation systems.

[1]  Jörn von Grabe,et al.  Flow resistance for different types of windows in the case of buoyancy ventilation , 2013 .

[2]  E. R. Hitchin,et al.  A review of experimental techniques for the investigation of natural ventilation in buildings , 1967 .

[3]  Mattheos Santamouris,et al.  On the combination of air velocity and flow measurements in single sided natural ventilation configurations , 1996 .

[4]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  A new empirical model for predicting single-sided, wind-driven natural ventilation in buildings , 2012 .

[5]  S. Chandra,et al.  Correlations for pressure distribution on buildings and calculation of natural-ventilation airflow , 1988 .

[6]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Ventilation performance prediction for buildings: A method overview and recent applications , 2009 .

[7]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Natural Ventilation in Buildings: Measurement in a Wind Tunnel and Numerical Simulation with Large Eddy Simulation , 2003 .

[8]  Cheuk Ming Mak,et al.  Numerical evaluation of louver configuration and ventilation strategies for the windcatcher system , 2011 .

[9]  R. Kraichnan.  Diffusion by a Random Velocity Field , 1970 .

[10]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  A zero-equation turbulence model for indoor airflow simulation , 1998 .

[11]  Mats Sandberg,et al.  Evaluation of Discharge Coefficients for Window Openings in Wind Driven Natural Ventilation , 2006 .

[12]  Nyuk Hien Wong,et al.  The study of active stack effect to enhance natural ventilation using wind tunnel and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations , 2004 .

[13]  G. Hetsroni.  Handbook of hydraulic resistance , 1990 .

[14]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Study of natural ventilation in buildings with large eddy simulation , 2001 .

[15]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  A semi-empirical model for studying the impact of thermal mass and cost-return analysis on mixed-mode ventilation in office buildings , 2013 .

[16]  Claude-Alain Roulet,et al.  Natural ventilation for passive cooling: measurement of discharge coefficients , 1998 .

[17]  O. G. Martynenko,et al.  Handbook of hydraulic resistance , 1986 .

[18]  Mats Sandberg,et al.  An Alternative View on the Theory of Cross-Ventilation , 2004 .

[19]  Bje Bert Blocken,et al.  A venturi-shaped roof for wind-induced natural ventilation of buildings: wind tunnel and CFD evaluation of different design configurations , 2011 .

[20]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[21]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  Wind Driven Flow through Openings – A Review of Discharge Coefficients , 2004 .

[22]  Max H. Sherman,et al.  Comparison of Measured and Predicted Infiltration Using the LBL Infiltration Model , 1986 .

[23]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[24]  Dominique Marchio,et al.  Full scale experimental study of single-sided ventilation: Analysis of stack and wind effects , 2011 .

[25]  S. Murakami,et al.  Wind Tunnel Test on Velocity-Pressure Field of Cross-Ventilation with Open Windows , 1991 .

[26]  P. Richards,et al.  Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ε turbulence model , 1993 .

[27]  Per Heiselberg,et al.  Single-sided natural ventilation driven by wind pressure and temperature difference , 2008 .

[28]  I. Celik,et al.  Random Flow Generation Technique for Large Eddy Simulations and Particle-Dynamics Modeling , 2001 .

[29]  C A Pickering,et al.  The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. , 1984, British medical journal.

[30]  Francis Allard,et al.  Natural ventilation in buildings : a design handbook , 1998 .

[31]  Paul Fazio,et al.  The influence of turbulent wind on air change rates—a modelling approach , 1991 .

[32]  P. Linden.  THE FLUID MECHANICS OF NATURAL VENTILATION , 1999 .

[33]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Effect of fluctuating wind direction on cross natural ventilation in buildings from large eddy simulation , 2002 .

[34]  Refrigerating.  ASHRAE handbook of fundamentals , 1967 .

[35]  End Use.  Annual energy review , 1984 .

[36]  C. Chu,et al.  A laboratory experiment of shear-induced natural ventilation , 2011 .

[37]  B. Stratford.  The prediction of separation of the turbulent boundary layer , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  Wai Ling Lee,et al.  Influence of Window Types on Natural Ventilation of Residential Buildings in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[39]  Andrew Quinn,et al.  A Comparison of CFD and Full-scale Measurements for Analysis of Natural Ventilation , 2006 .

[40]  Petr Svoboda,et al.  Window ventilation efficiency in the case of buoyancy ventilation , 2014 .