Developing an Instrument to Measure Perceived Input Control on Online Platforms from the App Developer Perspective

Over the last decade, applications of third-party app developers have increasingly become the cornerstone of software platform ecosystems’ success and sustainability. Given their importance, the procedures and practices used on platforms to screen and sort out applications are crucial means to regulate their influx. Although traditional control mechanisms applied on software-based platforms have been widely studied in Information Systems (IS) research, there is still a lack of research on input control and how it is conceptualized and measured from an app developer perspective. In this researchin-progress paper, we present the initial stages of a scale development process and present an initial construct to measure perceived input control from an application developers’ perspective. We accomplish this by first providing a structured literature review across the leading IS and management journals and conference papers. Based on this review and subsequent open-ended expert interviews, we developed a preliminary measurement instrument that not only captures app developers’ overall perceptions of input control across different platform contexts, but also breaks these perceptions down into distinct input control factors. The results of our study are expected to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of input control in general and platform-specific input control mechanisms in particular.

[1]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Perceived Software Platform Openness: The Scale and its Impact on Developer Satisfaction , 2011, ICIS.

[4]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[5]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[6]  Achim Krausert Performance Management for Different Employee Groups , 2009 .

[7]  Ulrich Remus,et al.  The View from the Top - How Senior Executives Exercise control over Information Systems Projects to Enhance Performance , 2017, ECIS.

[8]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[9]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[10]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[11]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Differential effects of formal and self-control in mobile platform ecosystems: Multi-method findings on third-party developers' continuance intentions and application quality , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[13]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Network effects on crowdfunding platforms: Exploring the implications of relaxing input control , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  Mobile Applications Development on Apple and Google Platforms , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Konstantinos Manikas,et al.  Revisiting software ecosystems Research: A longitudinal literature study , 2016, J. Syst. Softw..

[20]  Beate Littig,et al.  Expert Interviews: An Introduction to a New Methodological Debate , 2009 .

[21]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Desertion by App Developers , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks , 2012 .

[24]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[25]  Roman Beck,et al.  Control Balancing in Information Systems Development Offshoring Projects , 2013, MIS Q..

[26]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies , 1984 .

[28]  Thomas Hess,et al.  How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[30]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[31]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Effective Project Control: Insights from the Australian Construction Industry , 2004, PACIS.

[33]  Magnus Mähring IT project governance , 2002 .

[34]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[36]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research , 2010 .

[37]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Balancing and Rebalancing in the Creation and Evolution of Organizational Control , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems , 2009, IWSECO@ICSR.

[40]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[41]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment , 2001, MIS Q..

[42]  Bernard J. Jaworski Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[43]  V. G. Ouchi,et al.  A conceptual framework for the design and organizational control mechanisms , 1979 .

[44]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[45]  Cecil Eng Huang Chua,et al.  Enacting Clan Control in Complex IT Projects: A Social Capital Perspective , 2012, MIS Q..

[46]  Elizabeth A. Hoffmann Open-Ended Interviews, Power, and Emotional Labor , 2007 .

[47]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[49]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[50]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  “Openness” with and without Information Technology: a framework and a brief history , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[51]  Confirmation Model UNDERSTANDING INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONTINUANCE: AN EXPECTATION- , 2001 .

[52]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Opening the floodgates: the implications of increasing platform openness in crowdfunding , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[53]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[54]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Effects of Social Interaction Dynamics on Platforms , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Josep Lluís Cano Giner,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .