Clinical Significance of bZIP In-Frame CEBPA-Mutated Normal Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Purpose We evaluated the characteristics of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (CEBPA) mutations and the significance of a basic leucine zipper in-frame mutation (bZIPin-f) of CEBPA in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with a normal karyotype. Materials and Methods Based on updated knowledge of CEBPA mutations, we conducted next-generation sequencing analyses in a previously established real-world cohort. Results Among 78 of a total of 395 patients (19.7%), 50 had bZIPin-f CEBPA, and 28 had non-bZIPin-f CEBPA. In the multivariate analysis, patients with NPM1mut, those with bZIPin-f CEBPA, and those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) had favorable overall survival (OS), but FLT3-ITDmut was a poor prognostic indicator. For relapse-free survival (RFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse, bZIPin-f CEBPA, and allo-HCT were associated with favorable outcomes; FLT3-ITDpos was associated with worse outcomes. In the CEBPA double-mutated group (CEBPAdm), bZIPin-f CEBPA was associated with superior outcomes in terms of OS (p=0.007) and RFS (p=0.007) compared with non-bZIPin-f CEBPA. Of 50 patients with bZIPin-f CEBPA, 36 patients had at least one mutation. When grouped by the presence of mutations in chromatic/DNA modifiers (C), cohesion complex (C), and splicing genes (S) (CCS mutations), CCS-mutated bZIPin-f CEBPA was associated with poor OS (p=0.044; hazard ratio [HR], 2.419) and a trend in inferior RFS (p=0.186; HR, 1.838). Conclusion Only bZIPin-f CEBPA was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with CEBPAdm. However, some mutations accompanying bZIPin-f CEBPA showed inferior OS; thus, further studies with larger numbers of patients are required for clear conclusions of the significance of bZIPin-f CEBPA.

[1]  Long Su,et al.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia With CEBPA Mutations: Current Progress and Future Directions , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[2]  J. Kanda,et al.  Prognostic impact of CEBPA bZIP domain mutation in acute myeloid leukemia , 2021, Blood advances.

[3]  H. Einsele,et al.  CEBPA Mutations in 4708 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Differential Impact of bZIP and TAD Mutations on Outcome. , 2021, Blood.

[4]  R. Ries,et al.  CEBPA bZip Mutations are Associated with Favorable Prognosis in de novo AML: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2021, Blood.

[5]  E. Hoster,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity of cytogenetically normal AML with mutations of CEBPA. , 2018, Blood advances.

[6]  Wei Li,et al.  Mutational spectrum of acute myeloid leukemia patients with double CEBPA mutations based on next-generation sequencing and its prognostic significance , 2018, Oncotarget.

[7]  Zhaolei Zhang,et al.  Assessment of a new genomic classification system in acute myeloid leukemia with a normal karyotype , 2017, Oncotarget.

[8]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. , 2017, Blood.

[9]  Z. Mo,et al.  Favorable prognosis of biallelic CEBPA gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia patients: a meta‐analysis , 2015, European journal of haematology.

[10]  C Haferlach,et al.  The role of different genetic subtypes of CEBPA mutated AML , 2014, Leukemia.

[11]  Sang Hyuk Park,et al.  CEBPA single mutation can be a possible favorable prognostic indicator in NPM1 and FLT3-ITD wild-type acute myeloid leukemia patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk. , 2013, Leukemia research.

[12]  L. Bullinger,et al.  The value of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in prognostically favorable acute myeloid leukemia with double mutant CEBPA. , 2013, Blood.

[13]  Y. Kanda,et al.  Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR' for medical statistics , 2012, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[14]  T. Naoe,et al.  [Classification of acute myeloid leukemia]. , 2012, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[15]  R. Hills,et al.  Prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in a large cohort of younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: impact of double CEBPA mutations and the interaction with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Bas J. Wouters,et al.  Brief Report Results and Discussion , 2022 .

[17]  Daniel G Tenen,et al.  Dysregulation of the C/EBPalpha differentiation pathway in human cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Axel Benner,et al.  Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  N. Shinton WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues , 2007 .

[20]  M. Minden,et al.  Normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia patients with CEBPA double mutation have a favorable prognosis but no survival benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplant , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[21]  Brunangelo Falini,et al.  Mutational landscape of AML with normal cytogenetics: biological and clinical implications. , 2013, Blood reviews.

[22]  G. Behre,et al.  Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2001, Nature genetics.