Data-Driven Intervention: Correcting Mathematics Students' Misconceptions, not Mistakes

In an age when reform is based on standards and instruction is based on research, this article gives practical advice for how mathematics teachers can analyze errors in student problems to create interventions that aid not only the individual’s development, but the entire class’s as well. By learning how to correct mathematics students’ misconceptions, rather than their mistakes, teachers have the potential to both target more students and increase those students’ conceptual understanding of the topic at hand. From the post-test scores on the Common / Habitual Algebra Student Misconceptions – Function Families (CHASM) , a tool used to assess teachers’ function family content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge that was given after a three-day, overnight professional development workshop, , teachers averaged a 43% improvement in their ability to identify the common misconceptions present in students’ scenario test example problems and in creating suitable interventions for that misconception. This article (a) highlights the results found from ten Algebra teachers’ use of this pedagogical skill after a three-day overnight workshop entitled Teaching Algebra Concepts through Technology (TACT2), (b) identifies and categorizes misconceptions, and (c) provides pedagogical intervention support for correcting misconceptions rather than errors. As one teacher commented, “A minor (pedagogical) tweak resulted in a major revelation.”

[1]  Intuitive misconceptions In Algebra As A Source Of Math Anxiety , 1981 .

[2]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. , 1985 .

[3]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Learning and teaching with understanding. , 1992 .

[4]  J. Stigler,et al.  Understanding and Improving Classroom Mathematics Instruction: An Overview of the TIMSS Video Study , 1997 .

[5]  Neven Jurkovic Diagnosing and correcting student's misconceptions in an educational computer algebra system , 2001, ISSAC '01.

[6]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice , 2002 .

[7]  A. Schoenfeld Making Mathematics Work for All Children: Issues of Standards, Testing, and Equity , 2002 .

[8]  Larry Bedgood Driven by Data , 2004 .

[9]  The Middle Path in Math Instruction: Solutions for Improving Math Education , 2004 .

[10]  Rachel Brown-Chidsey,et al.  Response to Intervention: Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice. Practical Intervention in the Schools Series. Second Edition. , 2005 .

[11]  P. Tsamir,et al.  In-Service Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Views of Errors in the Classroom , 2005 .

[12]  Evelyn S. Johnson,et al.  Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI): How to Do It. [RTI Manual]. , 2006 .

[13]  Michael E. Martinez What is Metacognition? , 2006 .

[14]  Jonathan Diamond,et al.  The Uses of Testing Data in Urban Elementary Schools: Some Lessons from Chicago , 2007, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  H. Hill,et al.  Assessing Elemental and Structural Validity: Data from Teachers, Non-teachers, and Mathematicians , 2007 .

[16]  chapter 10 The Uses of Testing Data in Urban Elementary Schools: Some Lessons from Chicago , 2007 .

[17]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? ☆ , 2007 .

[18]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[19]  Charalambos Y. Charalambous,et al.  Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching and the Mathematical Quality of Instruction: An Exploratory Study , 2008 .

[20]  E. Mandinach,et al.  Using Student Achievement Data to Support Instructional Decision Making. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2009-4067. , 2009 .

[21]  Hyman Bass,et al.  Combining the Development of Practice and the Practice of Development in Teacher Education , 2009, The Elementary School Journal.

[22]  Rob Kadel Data-Driven Decision Making--Not Just a Buzz Word. , 2010 .

[23]  M. Veenman,et al.  Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study , 2010 .

[24]  David C. Parker,et al.  Instructionally Valid Assessment within Response to Intervention , 2010 .

[25]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[26]  Standardized Testing for Outcome Assessment: Analysis of the Educational Testing Systems MBA Tests. , 2010 .

[27]  Barbara Means,et al.  Teachers' Ability to Use Data to Inform Instruction: Challenges and Supports. , 2011 .

[28]  Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction , 2011 .

[29]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Responsiveness-to-Intervention , 2012, Journal of learning disabilities.

[30]  Ben Clarke,et al.  Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for Elementary and Middle Schools. NCEE 2009-4060. , 2009 .

[31]  Impact of the Michigan Merit Curriculum in Mathematics : Are Teachers Ready to Instruct At - Risk and Special Needs Students? , 2013 .

[32]  Umar Ibrahim Haruna Frameworks for Teachers’ Knowledge of Mathematics , 2015 .