Comparison of the Carbon Nanofiber-/Fiber- and Silicone-Based Electrodes for Bioimpedance Measurements

Electrodes for bioimpedance measurements remain a challenge. In practice, commercially available nonpolarizable silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) gel electrodes prove to be the best option for bioimpedance-based testing. The hydrogel layer reduces the problematic electrode–skin interface impedance, which results in a highly reliable signal. Our workgroup is developing a wearable device that estimates aortic blood pressure from the bioimpedance taken from the wrist area. Understandably, wet electrodes do not suit for a wearable, and there is a need for dry, soft, reusable, and stable electrodes. This study proposes stretchable carbon nanofiber/carbon fiber silicone electrodes as an alternative for cardiac signal measurements with bioimpedance. Five different electrode materials are tested and analyzed: Ag/AgCl gel, Ag/AgCl dry, two carbon and silicone composite materials, and carbon textile. To compare the electrodes’ characteristics, the current through the tissue under the changing pressure, frequency, contact duration, and skin preparation is registered, and the electrode–skin impedance is calculated. The soft and stretchable carbon fiber silicone electrodes proved to have similar response as rigid nonpolarizable Ag/AgCl dry electrodes. Selected methods and proposed instrumentation ensure acceptable reproducibility of the base value and the modulation depth of the measured impedance despite the different electrode materials, large variation of the electrode–skin impedance, and the actual measurement current.

[1]  Mart Min,et al.  Investigation of cost-effective carbon nanofiber/carbon fiber and silicone polymer composite material for wearable bioimpedance device , 2019, 2019 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[2]  W. Olson,et al.  Time and frequency dependence of disposable ECG electrode-skin impedance. , 1979, Medical instrumentation.

[3]  B. B. Narakathu,et al.  Development of printed and flexible dry ECG electrodes , 2018, Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research.

[4]  Guangli Li,et al.  Towards conductive-gel-free electrodes: Understanding the wet electrode, semi-dry electrode and dry electrode-skin interface impedance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy fitting , 2018, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

[5]  Omar J. Escalona,et al.  Performance assessment of dry electrodes for wearable long term cardiac rhythm monitoring: Skin-electrode impedance spectroscopy , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Taehoon Kim,et al.  Bioinspired, Highly Stretchable, and Conductive Dry Adhesives Based on 1D-2D Hybrid Carbon Nanocomposites for All-in-One ECG Electrodes. , 2016, ACS nano.

[7]  Fredi Kronenberg,et al.  Miniature ambulatory skin conductance monitor and algorithm for investigating hot flash events , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[8]  Voicu Groza,et al.  Impact of Skin–Electrode Interface on Electrocardiogram Measurements Using Conductive Textile Electrodes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Measuring depth depends on frequency in electrical skin impedance measurements , 1999 .

[10]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Effect of Pressure on Skin-Electrode Impedance in Wearable Biomedical Measurement Devices , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Almudena Rivadeneyra,et al.  Inexpensive and flexible nanographene-based electrodes for ubiquitous electrocardiogram monitoring , 2019, npj Flexible Electronics.

[12]  Zhen Fang,et al.  Review of Stratum Corneum Impedance Measurement in Non-Invasive Penetration Application , 2018, Biosensors.

[13]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Skin Electrode Impedance of Textile Electrodes for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy , 2007 .

[14]  Gunther Ardelt,et al.  Measurements of Electrode Skin Impedances using Carbon Rubber Electrodes – First Results , 2013 .

[15]  Olson Wh,et al.  Time and frequency dependence of disposable ECG electrode-skin impedance. , 1979 .

[16]  Fernando Seoane,et al.  Comparison of dry-textile electrodes for electrical bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements , 2010 .

[17]  Roman Kusche,et al.  Dry electrodes for bioimpedance measurements—design, characterization and comparison , 2018, Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.

[18]  Sang-Hoon Lee,et al.  CNT/PDMS Composite Flexible Dry Electrodesfor Long-Term ECG Monitoring , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  J. Webster,et al.  The origin of skin-stretch-caused motion artifacts under electrodes. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[20]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[21]  R H Guy,et al.  Homogeneous transport in a heterogeneous membrane: water diffusion across human stratum corneum in vivo. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[22]  J. Rosell,et al.  Skin impedance from 1 Hz to 1 MHz , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Andreas Demosthenous,et al.  A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[24]  Lin Yang,et al.  The Frequency Spectral Properties of Electrode-Skin Contact Impedance on Human Head and Its Frequency-Dependent Effects on Frequency-Difference EIT in Stroke Detection from 10Hz to 1MHz , 2017, PloS one.

[25]  R. Fish,et al.  Conduction of Electrical Current to and Through the Human Body: A Review , 2009, Eplasty.

[26]  Andy Adler,et al.  Bioimpedance spectroscopy processing and applications , 2014 .