Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices

Aims: To characterise the development of noise induced damage to hearing. Methods: Hearing and noise exposure were prospectively monitored among a cohort of newly enrolled construction industry apprentices and a comparison group of graduate students, using standard pure tone audiometry and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). A total of 328 subjects (632 ears) were monitored annually an average of 3.4 times. In parallel to these measures, noise exposure and hearing protection device (HPD) use were extensively monitored during construction work tasks. Recreational/non-occupational exposures also were queried and monitored in subgroups of subjects. Trade specific mean exposure Leq levels, with and without accounting for the variable use of hearing protection in each trade, were calculated and used to group subjects by trade specific exposure level. Mixed effects models were used to estimate the change in hearing outcomes over time for each exposure group. Results: Small but significant exposure related changes in DPOAEs over time were observed, especially at 4 kHz with stimulus levels (L1) between 50 and 75 dB, with less clear but similar patterns observed at 3 kHz. After controlling for covariates, the high exposure group had annual changes in 4 kHz emissions of about 0.5 dB per year. Pure tone audiometric thresholds displayed only slight trends towards increased threshold levels with increasing exposure groups. Some unexpected results were observed, including an apparent increase in DPOAEs among controls over time, and improvement in behavioural thresholds among controls at 6 kHz only. Conclusions: Results indicate that construction apprentices in their first three years of work, with average noise exposures under 90 dBA, have measurable losses of hearing function. Despite numerous challenges in using DPOAEs for hearing surveillance in an industrial setting, they appear somewhat more sensitive to these early changes than is evident with standard pure tone audiometry.

[1]  Malgorzata Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska,et al.  Ototoxic Effects of Occupational Exposure to Styrene and Co-Exposure to Styrene and Noise , 2003, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[2]  A GLORIG,et al.  PERMANENT THRESHOLD SHIFT CHANGES PRODUCED BY NOISE EXPOSURE AND AGING. , 1964, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  Yongbing Shi,et al.  ABR and DPOAE Detection of Cochlear Damage by Gentamicin , 1997, Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology.

[4]  W. Sułkowski,et al.  The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. , 1999, International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health.

[5]  Youshouzhai Gu Echo , 1980, The Craft of Poetry.

[6]  Richard Neitzel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Hearing Protection Among Construction Workers , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[7]  Dt Kemp,et al.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Perspective , 1997 .

[8]  W BURNS,et al.  STUDY OF NOISE AND HEARING IN JUTE WEAVING. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. J. Knight Hearing and Noise in Industry , 1970 .

[10]  M. Lutman,et al.  Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  William E Daniell,et al.  Increased reporting of occupational hearing loss: workers' compensation in Washington State, 1984-1998. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[12]  R Neitzel,et al.  An assessment of occupational noise exposures in four construction trades. , 1999, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  C Meyer-Bisch,et al.  Hearing loss due to partly impulsive industrial noise exposure at levels between 87 and 90 dB(A). , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Martin S. Robinette,et al.  Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications , 1997 .

[16]  R. Bobbin,et al.  Chronic low-level noise exposure alters distortion product otoacoustic emissions , 1996, Hearing Research.

[17]  Alice H Suter,et al.  Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[18]  A. Forge,et al.  Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment , 1989, Hearing Research.

[19]  R. Neitzel,et al.  Noise exposure among construction electricians. , 2001, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[20]  W A Ahroon,et al.  The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: II. Prediction of chronic-noise effects by brief pure-tone exposures , 1993, Hearing Research.

[22]  R Neitzel,et al.  Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[23]  Hendrikus Duifhuis Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions: A Time Domain Analysis , 2006, ORL.

[24]  Karl D. Kryter Physiological, Psychological, and Social Effects of Noise , 1984 .

[25]  D L Johnson Field studies: industrial exposures. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  L. Sheppard,et al.  Comparison of task-based estimates with full-shift measurements of noise exposure. , 2003, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.